Matrix inhibition by Salmonella excludes uropathogenic E. coli from biofilm

被引:3
|
作者
Miryala, Sandeep [1 ]
Nair, Veena G. [1 ]
Chandramohan, S. [1 ]
Srinandan, C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Res Infect Dis, Sch Chem & Biotechnol, Biofilm Biol Lab, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Competitive exclusion; Interference competition; Uropathogenic E. coli; Biofilm matrix; Salmonella; Enterobacteriaceae; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; INTERFERENCE; EVOLUTION; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; COLONIZATION; COMPETITION; BIOGENESIS; GENETICS; FORM;
D O I
10.1093/femsec/fiaa214
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Biofilm is a predominant lifestyle of bacteria that comprises of cells as collectives enmeshed in a polymeric matrix. Biofilm formation is vital for bacterial species as it provides access to nutrients and protects the cells from environmental stresses. Here we show that interference in biofilm matrix production is a strategy by the competing bacterial species to reduce the ability of the other species to colonize a surface. Escherichia coli colonies that differ in matrix production display different morphologies on Congo red agar media, which we exploited for screening bacterial isolates capable of inhibiting the matrix. The cell-free supernatants from growth culture of the screened isolates impaired uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) UTI89 strain's biofilm. A physicochemical analysis suggested that the compound could be a glycopeptide or a polysaccharide. Isolates that inhibited matrix production belonged to species of the family Enterobacteriaceae such as Shigella, Escherichia, Enterobacter and Salmonella. Competition experiments between the isolates and the UPEC strain resulted in mutual inhibition, particularly during biofilm formation causing significant reduction in productivity and fitness. Furthermore, we show that Salmonella strains competitively excluded the UPEC strain in the biofilm by inhibiting its matrix production, highlighting the role of interference competition.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Catechin Synergistic and Antibacterial Efficacy on Biofilm Formation and acrA Gene Expression of Uropathogenic E. coli Clinical Isolates
    Jubair, Najwan
    Mogana, R.
    Fatima, Ayesha
    Mahdi, Yasir K.
    Abdullah, Nor Hayati
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (09):
  • [42] Fosfomycin trometamol activity on biofilm and intracellular bacterial communities produced by Uropathogenic E. coli isolated from patients with Urinary tract infection.
    Robino, L.
    Gonzalez, M. J.
    Radio, G.
    Gomez, V.
    Scavone, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 73 : 142 - 142
  • [43] Study on E. coli and Salmonella biofilms from fresh fruits and vegetables
    Amrutha, Balagopal
    Sundar, Kothandapani
    Shetty, Prathapkumar Halady
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE, 2017, 54 (05): : 1091 - 1097
  • [44] Study on E. coli and Salmonella biofilms from fresh fruits and vegetables
    Balagopal Amrutha
    Kothandapani Sundar
    Prathapkumar Halady Shetty
    Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2017, 54 : 1091 - 1097
  • [45] Escherichia coli-Mediated Impairment of Ureteric Contractility Is Uropathogenic E. coli Specific
    Floyd, Rachel V.
    Upton, Mathew
    Hultgren, Scott J.
    Wray, Susan
    Burdyga, Theodor V.
    Winstanley, Craig
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 206 (10): : 1589 - 1596
  • [46] MYC inhibition, courtesy of E. coli
    O'Leary, Karen
    NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2021, 21 (04) : 0 - 0
  • [47] Horizontal transfer of class 1 integrons from uropathogenic Escherichia coli to E. coli K12
    Eloisa Poey, Maria
    Lavina, Magela
    MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS, 2018, 117 : 16 - 22
  • [48] MYC inhibition, courtesy of E. coli
    Karen O'Leary
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2021, 20 (4) : 264 - 264
  • [49] PITing it forward: A new link in the journey of uropathogenic E. coli in the urothelium
    Joshi, Chetanchandra S.
    Cegelski, Lynette
    Mysorekar, Indira U.
    CELL REPORTS, 2022, 39 (04):
  • [50] MYC inhibition, courtesy of E. coli
    O'Leary, Karen
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2021, 20 (04) : 264 - 264