Seed-specific placement of in-furrow fungicides for control of seedling disease in cotton

被引:6
|
作者
Hancock, JH
Wilkerson, JB [1 ]
Moody, FH
Newman, MA
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Biosyst Engn & Environm Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Entomol & Plant Pathol, Jackson, TN 38301 USA
关键词
seed-specific; precision chemical application; cotton; seedling disease; fungicide; in-furrow treatment;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2003.12.004
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Fungicides are often applied as in-furrow sprays during planting to control cotton seedling disease. To be effective, the fungicide product should cover each seed and the surrounding soil, thus forming a zone of protection for each emerging seedling. Traditional practice has been to apply the product as a solid band along the length of the furrow. However, limiting fungicide application to an area near the cottonseed, and minimizing the amount of chemical applied between seeds, could reduce fungicide inputs significantly while maintaining an acceptable level of disease control. To this end, a seed-specific applicator has been developed to apply discrete pulses of liquid chemical to individual seeds and the surrounding soil at planting. The concept of seed-specific fungicide application was evaluated during 2002 and 2003 using side-by-side, field comparisons of seed-specific and conventional applications of PCNB and etridiazole in plots inoculated with Pythium spp. and Rhizoctonia solani. Cotton was planted at 9.8 seeds m(-1), and seed-specific treatments were applied as spray bands 5.1 cm in length such that fungicide savings of 50% were realized where seed-specific applications were implemented. Seedling disease pressure was present in both years of the study. Stands in the untreated plots averaged less than 25% of that in treated plots. Stand counts in all plots receiving an in-furrow fungicide treatment were significantly greater (P = 0.05) than in untreated plots. There were no significant differences in either year among the seed-specific and conventional treatments. In these tests, seed-specific fungicide applications provided seedling disease control comparable to conventional application while reducing fungicide use by 50%. Seed-specific application equipment has potential to help cotton growers reduce input costs and increase production efficiency. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 794
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Seed-specific overexpression of cotton GhDGAT1 gene leads to increased oil accumulation in cottonseed
    Peng Wu
    Xiaolan Xu
    Jingwen Li
    Jun Zhang
    Siyuan Chang
    Xiyan Yang
    Xiaoping Guo
    The Crop Journal, 2021, 9 (02) : 487 - 490
  • [33] Seed treatment versus in-furrow fungicide effects on plant stand establishment and control of Rhizoctonia crown and root rot in sugar beet
    Brantner, J. R.
    Chanda, A. K.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 108 (10) : 156 - 156
  • [34] Seed-specific overexpression of cotton GhDGAT1 gene leads to increased oil accumulation in cottonseed
    Wu, Peng
    Xu, Xiaolan
    Li, Jingwen
    Zhang, Jun
    Chang, Siyuan
    Yang, Xiyan
    Guo, Xiaoping
    CROP JOURNAL, 2021, 9 (02): : 487 - 490
  • [35] Control of Cotton Seedling Damping-off by Treating Seed with Inorganic Salts
    Mansour, Mahmoud T. M.
    Aly, Aly A.
    Habeb, Marian M.
    Mohamed, Heba I.
    GESUNDE PFLANZEN, 2020, 72 (03): : 273 - 283
  • [36] CONTROL OF RHIZOCTONIA-SOLANI DAMPING-OFF IN COTTON BY SEED TREATMENT WITH FUNGICIDES
    LISKER, N
    MEIRI, A
    CROP PROTECTION, 1992, 11 (02) : 155 - 159
  • [37] Seed-Specific Mass and Root Growth Relate to Perennial Bunchgrass Seedling Survivorship Under Highly Limited Nutrient Supply
    Quigley, Kathleen
    Ziegenhagen, Lori
    Hamerlynck, Erik
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 90 : 271 - 278
  • [39] Seed-specific overexpression of antioxidant genes in Arabidopsis enhances oxidative stress tolerance during germination and early seedling growth
    Xi, Dong-Mei
    Liu, Wu-Shuang
    Yang, Guo-Dong
    Wu, Chang-Ai
    Zheng, Cheng-Chao
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (07) : 796 - 806