Using Design Thinking to Explore Rural Experiential Education Barriers and Opportunities

被引:8
|
作者
Wolcott, Michael D. [1 ,2 ]
McLaughlin, Jacqueline E. [2 ]
Hubbard, Devin K. [3 ,4 ]
Williams, Charlene R. [2 ]
Kiser, Stephanie N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Oral & Craniofacial Hlth Sci, Adams Sch Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Practice Adv & Clin Educ, Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Joint Dept Biomed Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
关键词
design thinking; rural education; experiential education; creativity; methodology; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; HEALTH-CARE; STUDENTS; COMMUNITIES; PLACEMENTS; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1177/2382120521992333
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Design thinking is a creative problem-solving framework that can be used to better understand challenges and generate solutions in health professions education, such as the barriers to rural education. Rural education experiences can benefit students, providers, and patients; however, placement in and maintenance of rural education experiences offer unique challenges. Design thinking offers strategies to explore and address these challenges. METHODS: This study used a design thinking framework to identify barriers of student placement in rural locations; this was accomplished using strategies to empathize with users (eg, students, practitioners, and administrators) and define the problem. Data were collected from focus groups, interviews, and a design thinking workshop. Design activities promoted participant discussion by drawing pictures, discussing findings, and creating empathy maps of student experiences. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify salient barriers to rural experience selection and opportunities for support. RESULT: Focus group (n = 6), interview (n = 13), and workshop participants (n = 18) identified substantial advantages (eg, exposure to a wider variety of patients, less bureaucracy and constraints, more time with faculty) and disadvantages (eg, isolation, lack of housing, and commuting distances) of rural experiences. Participants identified physical, emotional, and social isolation as a significant barrier to student interest in and engagement in rural experiences. Workshop participants were able to generate over 100 ideas to address the most prominent theme of isolation. DISCUSSION: Design thinking strategies can be used to explore health professions education challenges, such as placement in rural settings. Through engagement with students, practitioners, and administrators it was identified that physical, social, and emotional isolation presents a significant barrier to student placement in rural experiences. This perspective can inform support systems for students, preceptors, and communities that participate in rural educational experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ACCESSIBILITY TO HIGHER EDUCATION IN KAZAKHSTAN: BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES
    Shnarbekova, M.
    Abdiraiymova, G.
    INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 589 - 596
  • [32] Barriers to and opportunities for integrating climbing in physical education
    Fruehauf, Anika
    Sagmeister, Dominik
    Kopp, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ADVENTURE EDUCATION AND OUTDOOR LEARNING, 2023,
  • [33] AN EXPERIENTIAL DESIGN THINKING COURSE FOR FRESHMEN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS
    Condoor, Sridhar S.
    Gorlewicz, Jenna L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, IMECE2022, VOL 7, 2022,
  • [34] Thinking on Architectural Design of Rural Supermarket
    Hao, Lijun
    INNOVATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE AND SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE, 2012, 238 : 525 - 528
  • [35] Thinking skills education: Using Design Method and Scientific Method
    Rusbult, Craig
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 241
  • [36] Using Design Thinking to break social barriers: An experience report with former inmates
    Canedo, Edna Dias
    Cancado, Emille Catarine Rodrigues
    Mota, Alana Paula Barbosa
    Bandeira, Ian Nery
    Costa, Pedro Henrique Teixeira
    Lima, Fernanda
    Amaral, Luis
    Bonifacio, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2024, 36 (07)
  • [37] DESIGN THINKING AND ART EDUCATION
    Taspinar, Seyda Eraslan
    ANADOLU UNIVERSITESI SANAT & TASARIM DERGISI-ANADOLU UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ART & DESIGN, 2022, 12 (02): : 379 - 397
  • [38] Design Thinking 101 for Education
    Sari, Eunice
    Tedjasaputra, Adi
    PROCEEDINGS OF 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HCI AND UX (CHIUXID 2018), 2018, : 118 - 121
  • [39] DESIGN THINKING CHALLENGES IN EDUCATION
    Ericson, Asa
    Bergstrom, Mattias
    Larsson, Andreas C.
    Toerlind, Peter
    ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 10: DESIGN EDUCATION AND LIFELONG LEARNING, 2009, : 89 - +
  • [40] Design thinking for engineering education
    Misaki, Daigo
    Ge, Xiao
    Seimitsu Kogaku Kaishi/Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 2019, 85 (07): : 636 - 639