Heparins for Unstable Angina and Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:0
|
作者
Hitzeman, Nathan [1 ]
Rafii, Flora [1 ]
机构
[1] Sutter Hlth Family Med Residency Program, Sacramento, CA USA
关键词
UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN; ENOXAPARIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Acute coronary syndrome represents a spectrum of disease that includes unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Despite treatment with aspirin, beta blockers, and nitroglycerin, unstable angina or NSTEMI are still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although emerging evidence suggests that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is more effective compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH), there are limited data to support the role of heparins as a drug class in the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Objectives: To determine the effect of heparins (UFH and LMWH) compared with placebo for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Search Strategy: The authors searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2002), Medline (1966 to Mali 2002), EMBASE (1980 to May 2002), and CINAHL (1982 to May 2002). Authors of included studies and pharmaceutical industry representatives were contacted to determine if unpublished studies that met the inclusion criteria were available. Selection Criteria: Randomized controlled trials of parenteral UFH or LMWH versus placebo in persons with acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina or NSTEMI). Data Collection and Analysis: Two reviewers independently assessed quality of studies. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Study authors were contacted to verify and clarify missing data. Main Results: Eight studies (3,318 participants) were included in this review. We found no evidence for difference in overall mortality between the groups treated with heparin and placebo (relative risk [RR] = 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36 to 1.98). Heparins reduced the occurrence of myocardial infarction (RR = 0.40; 95% Cl, 125 to 0.63; number needed to treat = 33), and increased the incidence if minor bleeds (RR = 6.80; 95% Cl, 1.23 to 37.49; number needed to harm = 17). Authors' Conclusions: Compared with placebo, patients treated with heparins had similar risks of mortality, revascularization, recurrent angina, major bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. However, those treated with heparins had a decreased risk of myocardial infarction and a higher incidence of minor bleeding.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 562
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic prediction model in subjects with low-risk unstable angina pectoris/Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Dakota, I
    Munawar, M.
    Pranata, R.
    Raffaello, W. M.
    Sukmawan, R.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 25 (16) : 5145 - 5152
  • [32] ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: Executive summary and recommendations
    Braunwald, E
    Antman, EM
    Beasley, JW
    Califf, RM
    Cheitlin, MD
    Hochman, JS
    Jones, RH
    Kereiakes, D
    Kupersmith, J
    Levin, TN
    Pepine, CJ
    Schaeffer, JW
    Smith, EE
    Steward, DE
    Theroux, P
    Gibbons, RMJ
    Alpert, JS
    Eagle, KA
    Faxon, DP
    Fuster, V
    Gardner, TJ
    Gregoratos, G
    Russell, RO
    Smith, SC
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2000, 51 (04) : 505 - 521
  • [33] Acute coronary lesions and troponin elevation in unstable angina pectoris or non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction
    Ambrose, JA
    Gould, RB
    Zairis, MN
    DeVoe, MC
    Nguyen, TH
    Geagea, JPM
    Arias, JH
    Prakash, AM
    Varshneya, N
    Meraj, P
    Barua, RS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 90 (07): : 770 - +
  • [34] Timing of intervention in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Banning, Amerjeet S.
    Gershlick, Anthony H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2018, 20 (0B) : B10 - B20
  • [35] An unusual cause of a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Levit, Rebecca D.
    Polomsky, Marek
    Vega, J. David
    Martin, David R.
    Kumar, Gautam
    HEART, 2014, 100 (20) : 1619 - +
  • [36] Unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis by TIMI score
    SLM Arruda
    HJP Branisso
    EC Figueiredo
    C Gangoni
    D Ferreira
    LR Del Sarto
    Critical Care, 11 (Suppl 3):
  • [37] New treatment guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Howard, PA
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 36 (11) : 1800 - 1804
  • [38] Unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an analysis by TIMI score
    SLM Arruda
    PC Miranda
    TPF Araújo
    KO Teixeira
    CS Souza
    RG Veizaga
    GA Souza
    JNL Costa
    Critical Care, 13 (Suppl 3):
  • [39] Unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction perspectives on combination therapy
    Villareal, RP
    Kim, P
    Ferguson, JJ
    Wilson, JM
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2001, 28 (04) : 276 - 287
  • [40] Unstable angina and non-ST segment elevation: surgical revascularization with different strategies
    Onorati, F
    De Feo, M
    Mastroroberto, P
    di Virgilio, A
    Esposito, A
    Polistena, M
    Renzulli, A
    Cotrufo, M
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2005, 27 (06) : 1043 - 1050