Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children

被引:136
|
作者
Wong, Sik-Nin
Sung, Rita Yn Tz
Leung, Lettie Chuk-Kwan
机构
[1] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Kwong Wah Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
blood pressure; children; datascope; Dinamap; European Society of Hypertension; international protocol; oscillometric; validation study; Welch-Allyn;
D O I
10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Aim To validate Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor, Dinamap Procare-120 and Datascope Accutorr Plus against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children aged 5-15 years old according to the International Protocol of European Society of Hypertension adapted for validation in children. Method One hundred and thirty two children were studied (44 for each device; 67 boys, 65 girls). Each underwent seven sequential BP measurements on the right arm resting in the sifting position, alternately with the mercury sphygmomanometer read simultaneously by two independent trained observers and the test device by a third observer. Results For the Welch-Allyn monitor, the mean +/- SD of differences (device minus auscultatory BP) were -4.39 +/- 4.82 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.1 +/- 707 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device failed phase 2.1 for both systolic blood pressure (55, 91 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) and diastolic blood pressure measurements (46, 82 and 95% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Dinamap device, the mean +/- SD of differences were -3.08 +/- 5.21 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.61 +/- 9.35 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 for systolic blood pressure (71, 96 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) but failed for diastolic blood pressure (51, 72 and 91% were within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Datascope device, mean +/- SD of differences were -0.9 +/- 4.33 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -1.20 +/- 6.48 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 in that 84, 97 and 99% of systolic blood pressure, and 61, 89 and 97% of diastolic blood pressure readings were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively. It also passed phase 2.2 for both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion We performed an independent validation of three oscillometric BP devices in children. Overall Datascope Accutorr Plus passed, whereas Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor and Dinamap Procare-120 failed an adapted IP-ESH. Blood Press Monit 11:281-291 (C) 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 291
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AUSCULTATORY AND OSCILLOMETRIC AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING: METHODS COMPARISON IN ADULT PATIENTS
    Zhemanyuk, Svitlana Pavlina
    Syvolap, Vitaliy Victorovich
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2023, 41 : E208 - E208
  • [42] AUTOMATIC OSCILLOMETRIC NIBP VERSUS MANUAL AUSCULTATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE IN THE PACU
    RAMSEY, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING, 1994, 10 (02): : 136 - 139
  • [43] Oscillometric vs. Auscultatory Blood Pressure Measurements and the Impact of Atrial Fibrillation
    Aburahma, Ahmed
    McFadden, Christopher B.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 551 - 551
  • [44] Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory blood pressure measuring device: The PMS Mandaus
    Shabeeh, H
    Cuckson, AC
    Jones, C
    Randhawa, M
    Shennan, AH
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 20 : S233 - S233
  • [45] Use of oscillometric devices in atrial fibrillation: a comparison of three devices and invasive blood pressure measurement
    Halfon, Matthieu
    Wuerzner, Gregoire
    Marques-Vidal, Pedro
    Taffe, Patrick
    Vaucher, Julien
    Waeber, Bernard
    Liaudet, Lucas
    Ltaief, Zied
    Popov, Milen
    Waeber, Gerard
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2018, 27 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [46] COMPARISON OF BLOOD-PRESSURE READINGS UTILIZING A MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETER AND AN ELECTRONIC DIGITAL SPHYGMOMANOMETER
    PICCARELLI, J
    POSNER, JM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 1975, 52 (11): : 796 - 796
  • [47] Oscillometric wrist blood pressure measuring devices
    Braam, RL
    Aslan, B
    Thien, T
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 61 (10): : 313 - 317
  • [48] Performance of oscillometric blood pressure devices in children in resource-poor settings
    Miranda, Juan Jaime
    Stanojevic, Sanja
    Bernabe-Ortiz, Antonio
    Gilman, Robert H.
    Smeeth, Liam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PREVENTION & REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (03): : 362 - 364
  • [49] Oscillometric blood pressure standards for children
    Park, MK
    Menard, SW
    Schoolfield, J
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) : 601 - 607
  • [50] The use of oscillometric blood pressure devices in children for fieldwork in resource poor settings
    Mirand, J. J.
    Stanojevic, S.
    Bernabe-Ortiz, A.
    Gilman, R. H.
    Smeeth, L.
    CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (12) : E414 - E415