Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children

被引:136
|
作者
Wong, Sik-Nin
Sung, Rita Yn Tz
Leung, Lettie Chuk-Kwan
机构
[1] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Kwong Wah Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
blood pressure; children; datascope; Dinamap; European Society of Hypertension; international protocol; oscillometric; validation study; Welch-Allyn;
D O I
10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Aim To validate Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor, Dinamap Procare-120 and Datascope Accutorr Plus against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children aged 5-15 years old according to the International Protocol of European Society of Hypertension adapted for validation in children. Method One hundred and thirty two children were studied (44 for each device; 67 boys, 65 girls). Each underwent seven sequential BP measurements on the right arm resting in the sifting position, alternately with the mercury sphygmomanometer read simultaneously by two independent trained observers and the test device by a third observer. Results For the Welch-Allyn monitor, the mean +/- SD of differences (device minus auscultatory BP) were -4.39 +/- 4.82 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.1 +/- 707 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device failed phase 2.1 for both systolic blood pressure (55, 91 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) and diastolic blood pressure measurements (46, 82 and 95% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Dinamap device, the mean +/- SD of differences were -3.08 +/- 5.21 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.61 +/- 9.35 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 for systolic blood pressure (71, 96 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) but failed for diastolic blood pressure (51, 72 and 91% were within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Datascope device, mean +/- SD of differences were -0.9 +/- 4.33 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -1.20 +/- 6.48 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 in that 84, 97 and 99% of systolic blood pressure, and 61, 89 and 97% of diastolic blood pressure readings were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively. It also passed phase 2.2 for both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion We performed an independent validation of three oscillometric BP devices in children. Overall Datascope Accutorr Plus passed, whereas Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor and Dinamap Procare-120 failed an adapted IP-ESH. Blood Press Monit 11:281-291 (C) 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 291
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer
    Rogers, P
    Burke, V
    Stroud, P
    Puddey, IB
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 26 (5-6) : 477 - 481
  • [2] Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BIRM-100beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer
    Mattu, GS
    Perry, TL
    Wright, JM
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2001, 6 (03) : 153 - 159
  • [3] COMPARISON OF THE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT RESULTS USING MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETER AND OSCILLOMETRIC SPHYGMOMANOMETER
    Irawan, Visakha Revana
    Setiawan, Gerry
    Susanto, David
    Turana, Yuda
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 : E8 - E8
  • [4] Comparison of Eight Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement Devices to a Mercury Sphygmomanometer in Children aged 1-15 years
    Winding, Louise
    Kamperis, Kostas
    Norgaard, Karen
    Rytter, Lene
    Thrane, Nana
    Ostergaard, Inge
    Cortes, Dina
    Wason, Malgorzata
    Rittig, Soren
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2013, 28 (08) : 1640 - 1640
  • [5] VALIDATION OF OSCILLOMETRIC, AUSCULTATORY AND R-WAVE GATED AUSCULTATORY AUTOMATED PORTABLE BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS BY INTRA-ARTERIAL LINE AND SPHYGMOMANOMETER
    GRAETTINGER, WF
    LIPSON, JL
    CHEUNG, DE
    WEBER, MA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (01): : A139 - A139
  • [6] Comparability of oscillometric to simultaneous auscultatory blood pressure measurement in children
    Ringrose, Jennifer S.
    Alabbas, Abdullah
    Jalali, Afrooz
    Khinda, Harsimran
    Morgan, Catherine
    Yiu, Verna
    Alexander, R. Todd
    Padwal, Raj
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2019, 24 (02) : 83 - 88
  • [7] Aneroid Auscultatory Sphygmomanometers and Automated Oscillometric Devices as Mercury-Free Alternatives in Children
    Song, Young Hwan
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2024, 54 (05) : 288 - 290
  • [8] Comparability of Oscillometric to Simultaneous Auscultatory Blood Pressure Measurement in Children.
    Ringrose, Jennifer S.
    Alabbas, Abdullah
    Jalali, Afrooz
    Khinda, Harsimran
    Morgan, Catherine
    Yiu, Verna
    Alexander, R. T.
    Padwal, Raj
    HYPERTENSION, 2018, 72
  • [9] COMPARISON BETWEEN OSCILLOMETRIC AND AUSCULTATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS
    Duzova, Ali
    Baskin, Esra
    Cakar, Nilgun
    Soylemezoglu, Oguz
    Yalcinkaya, Fatos
    Hayran, Mutlu
    PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2018, 33 (10) : 1818 - 1819
  • [10] Can auscultatory blood pressure normative values be used for evaluation of oscillometric blood pressure in children?
    Sulakova, Terezie
    Sulakova, Astrida
    Strnadel, Jiri
    Pavlicek, Jan
    Obermannova, Barbora
    Feber, Janusz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2017, 19 (04): : 381 - 387