Is Porter Hypothesis True or FalseA Perspective Based on Environmental Strategic Orientation

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Liming [1 ]
Yang, Li [1 ]
Ye, Fei [1 ]
Zhou, Guichuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Porter hypothesis; Environmental regulation; Technology innovation; Enterprise performance; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; PRESSURES;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-21248-3_54
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
With increasingly severe environmental regulations(ER), the need to develop efficient strategies towards environmental protection and high performance is a pressing issue for enterprises. However, extant literature on the subject rarely discusses how different environmental strategy orientations mediate the relationships involved in the Porter Hypothesis(PH). Therefore, this study focuses on an environmental strategy response to ER, and sustained high performance, by incorporating the idea of technology innovation(TI). We first divide environmental strategy into two modes: proactive environmental strategy(PES) and reactive environmental strategy(RES). We then contextualize two models to analyze the ER and enterprise performance(EP) correlation; and test the mediating effect of TI on this relationship, adhering to PES. The empirical data on 760 Chinese A-share listed enterprises in 2017 indicates that there is no generality in PH. An enterprises environmental strategic orientation may cause PH and traditional hypothesis disparity. ER is positively correlated with EP, with TI playing an intermediary role, in the PES mode; but in the RES approach, ER and EP exhibit a negative connect. This study holds great significance for enterprises aspiring to reinforce environmental protection, and promote strategic transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 738
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental regulation and productivity growth in the euro area: Testing the porter hypothesis
    Benatti, Nicola
    Groiss, Martin
    Kelly, Petra
    Lopez-Garcia, Paloma
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 126
  • [42] Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis
    Zarate-Marco, Anabel
    Valles-Gimenez, Jaime
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 40 (02) : 313 - 339
  • [43] Environmental judicature and enterprises' green technology innovation: A revisit of the porter hypothesis
    Han, Lei
    Xiao, Zijun
    Yu, Yongze
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2024, 91
  • [44] Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis
    Anabel Zárate-Marco
    Jaime Vallés-Giménez
    European Journal of Law and Economics, 2015, 40 : 313 - 339
  • [45] Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry
    Thomas Broberg
    Per-Olov Marklund
    Eva Samakovlis
    Henrik Hammar
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2013, 40 : 43 - 56
  • [46] The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
    Ambec, Stefan
    Cohen, Mark A.
    Elgie, Stewart
    Lanoie, Paul
    REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) : 2 - 22
  • [47] Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry
    Broberg, Thomas
    Marklund, Per-Olov
    Samakovlis, Eva
    Hammar, Henrik
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2013, 40 (01) : 43 - 56
  • [48] Market Inertia and the Introduction of Green Products: Can Strategic Effects Justify the Porter Hypothesis?
    Christos Constantatos
    Markus Herrmann
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 50
  • [49] Strategic orientation of organizations: risk management perspective
    Kavcic, Klemen
    Bertoncelj, Andrej
    KYBERNETES, 2010, 39 (05) : 735 - 749
  • [50] Market Inertia and the Introduction of Green Products: Can Strategic Effects Justify the Porter Hypothesis?
    Constantatos, Christos
    Herrmann, Markus
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 50 (02): : 267 - 284