Effect of local anesthetic concentration, dose and volume on the duration of single-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block with mepivacaine: a randomized controlled trial

被引:32
|
作者
Fenten, Maaike G. E. [3 ]
Schoenmakers, Karin P. W. [3 ]
Heesterbeek, Petra J. C. [2 ]
Scheffer, Gert Jan [3 ]
Stienstra, Rudolf [1 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Sint Maartensklin, Res Dept, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2015年 / 15卷
关键词
Axillary brachial plexus block; Mepivacaine; Volume; Concentration; Dose; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; NERVE-STIMULATION; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-015-0110-0
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: In what way volume, concentration and dose affect block duration is controversial. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effect of dose, volume and concentration of mepivacaine on the duration of sensory and motor blockade in ultrasound-guided single shot axillary brachial plexus blockade. Methods: In this parallel group randomized trial conducted in the Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, 45 adult patients undergoing minor orthopaedic forearm, wrist or hand surgery were randomized to 3 groups. Group A: 20 mL mepivacaine 1.5 %, Group B: 30 mL mepivacaine 1 % and Group C: 30 mL mepivacaine 1.5 %. Randomization was computer-generated, with allocation concealment by opaque sequentially numbered sealed envelopes. Patients and observers were blinded to group allocation. Primary outcome measure: duration of sensory block. Results: Forty-five patients were randomized, four patients were excluded and replaced, and 15 patients in each group were included in the analysis. Mean (95 % CI) sensory and motor block duration was 256 (230-282) and 254 (226-282) minutes in Group A, 226 (209-243) and 220 (200-240) minutes in Group B and 270 (249-291) and 264 (244-284) minutes in Group C. Duration of sensory and motor block duration differed significantly between groups (p = 0.012 and p = 0.016 respectively). Post-hoc analysis showed a significantly reduced sensory and motor block duration in Group B when compared to Group C of 44 min. No local anesthetic systemic toxicity was reported. Conclusions: When using mepivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block, a higher dose and concentration was associated with a longer duration of sensory and motor blockade, but not a higher volume.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimation of the minimum effective volume of 0.5% bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block
    Brenner, David G.
    Marjanek, Zsuzsanna
    Iohom, Gabriella
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (06) : 463 - 464
  • [22] Axillary approach versus the infraclavicular approach in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: comparison of anesthetic time
    Song, In Ae
    Gil, Nam-Su
    Choi, Eun-Young
    Sim, Sung-Eun
    Min, Seong-Won
    Ro, Young-Jin
    Kim, Chong Soo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 61 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [23] The Minimum Effective Anesthetic Volume of 0.75% Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
    Gautier, Philippe
    Vandepitte, Catherine
    Ramquet, Caroline
    DeCoopman, Mieke
    Xu, Daquan
    Hadzic, Admir
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2011, 113 (04): : 951 - 955
  • [24] Ultrasound-guided costoclavicular vs. axillary brachial plexus block: A randomized clinical study
    Nalini, Kadirehally Bheemanna
    Bevinaguddaiah, Yatish
    Thiyagarajan, Balaji
    Shivasankar, Archana
    Pujari, Vinayak Seenappa
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 37 (04) : 655 - 660
  • [25] Randomized prospective study of three different techniques for ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block
    Cunha Ferraro, Leonardo Henirque
    Takeda, Alexandre
    Castello Branco de Sousa, Paulo Cesar
    Gomes Mehlmann, Fernanda Moreira
    Mitsunaga Junior, Jorge Kiyoshi
    dos Reis Falcao, Luiz Fernando
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2018, 68 (01): : 62 - 68
  • [26] A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Perivascular and Perineural Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
    Bernucci, Francisca
    Gonzalez, Andrea P.
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    Tran, De Q. H.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2012, 37 (05) : 473 - 477
  • [27] Ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in volunteers; a randomized controlled trial
    Strid, J. M. C.
    Sauter, A. R.
    Ullensvang, K.
    Andersen, M. N.
    Daugaard, M.
    Bendtsen, M. A. F.
    Soballe, K.
    Pedersen, E. M.
    Borglum, J.
    Bendtsen, T. F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 118 (03) : 430 - 438
  • [28] Effect of bupivacaine concentration on the efficacy of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block
    Tariq, Alzahrani
    Abdulaziz, Al-Ahaideb
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 5 (02) : 190 - 194
  • [29] Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine as Local Anesthetic Adjuvants for Ultrasound-guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Blocks with Nerve Stimulation
    Lee, Myeong Jong
    Koo, Dae Jeong
    Choi, Yu Sun
    Lee, Kyu Chang
    Kim, Hye Young
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 29 (01): : 29 - 33
  • [30] Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block Techniques: Perineural Injection versus Single or Double Perivascular Infiltration
    Cho, Sooyoung
    Kim, Youn Jin
    Baik, Hee Jung
    Kim, Jong Hak
    Woo, Jae Hee
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 56 (03) : 838 - 844