Patient-provider communication quality for persons with disabilities: A cross-sectional analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey

被引:10
|
作者
Marlow, Nicole M. [1 ]
Samuels, Shenae K. [2 ]
Jo, Ara [1 ]
Mainous, Arch G., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Dept Hlth Serv Res Management & Policy, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Mem Healthcare Syst, Off Human Res, Hollywood, FL USA
关键词
Patient-provider communication; Persons with disabilities; Healthcare quality; PRIMARY-CARE; PHYSICIANS COMMUNICATION; SPEAKING PATIENTS; ENGLISH-SPEAKING; DISPARITIES; SPANISH; CONSULTATIONS; PERCEPTIONS; SERVICES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.03.010
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It is unclear how perceived patient-provider communication quality (PPPCQ) varies according to disability status. Lack of adequate patient-provider communication may prevent providers from considering healthcare issues that are relevant and important to persons with disabilities (PWD), potentially contributing to poorer health outcomes. Objective/Hypothesis: To examine PPPCQ by disability status using current U.S. Department of Health and Human Services standards for surveillance of functional disabilities. Methods: This cross-sectional study used nationally-representative data from the 2012-2013 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Participants were categorized as having any disability (hearing, vision, mobility, cognitive, self-care, and/or independent living limitations). PPPCQ was assessed using seven HINTS questions about communication with healthcare professionals. Linear regression was used to estimate mean differences in composite PPPCQ scores, and logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for a provider "always or usually" performing PPPCQ. Results: The study population comprised 5301 participants, representing 180,442,731 U.S. adults. Overall, 22.1% (weighted) reported any disability. Adjusted mean PPPCQ scores were significantly lower for PWD (72.8, 95% CI: 68.2-77.4) than persons without disability (78.3, 95% CI: 76.5-80.2), p = 0.021. More specifically, PWD were significantly less likely to be given attention needed to address feelings and emotions (OR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4, 0.9, p = 0.017), to have next steps understood (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8, p = 0.019), and to receive a clear explanation (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.8, p = 0.018). Conclusions: PWD are less likely to report key elements of effective patient-provider communication. Implementing patient-centered care may improve patient-provider communication for this vulnerable population. (c) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 737
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ASSOCIATION BETWEEN QUALITY OF PATIENT-PROVIDER COMMUNICATION AND ONLINE HEALTH INFORMATION EXCHANGE AND INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIORS IN PATIENTS
    Asan, Onur
    Crotty, Bradley H.
    Nagavally, Sneha
    Walker, Rebekah J.
    Egede, Leonard E.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 33 : S125 - S125
  • [22] Patient satisfaction with patient-provider interactions at time of diagnosis among early stage melanoma survivors: A cross-sectional survey
    Zaffran, Kailey
    Lazovich, DeAnn
    Boull, Christina
    Vogel, Rachel I.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 81 (05) : 1207 - 1209
  • [23] Racial Differences in Patient-provider Communication, Patient Self-efficacy, and Their Associations With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus-related Damage: A Cross-sectional Survey
    Sun, Kai
    Eudy, Amanda M.
    Criscione-Schreiber, Lisa G.
    Sadun, Rebecca E.
    Rogers, Jennifer L.
    Doss, Jayanth
    Corneli, Amy L.
    Bosworth, Hayden B.
    Clowse, Megan E. B.
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 48 (07) : 1022 - 1028
  • [24] Patient-Provider Lung Cancer Screening Discussions: An Analysis of a National Survey
    Nourmohammadi, Niki
    Liang, Trinity Hsiao Pei
    Sadigh, Gelareh
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2024, 25 (04) : e189 - e195.e2
  • [25] The National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]: a national cross-sectional analysis of talking to your doctor and other healthcare providers for health information
    Volkman, Julie E.
    Luger, Tana M.
    Harvey, Kimberly L. L.
    Hogan, Timothy P.
    Shimada, Stephanie L.
    Amante, Daniel
    McInnes, D. Keith
    Feng, Hua
    Houston, Thomas K.
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 15
  • [26] The National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey [HINTS]: a national cross-sectional analysis of talking to your doctor and other healthcare providers for health information
    Julie E Volkman
    Tana M Luger
    Kimberly LL Harvey
    Timothy P Hogan
    Stephanie L Shimada
    Daniel Amante
    D Keith McInnes
    Hua Feng
    Thomas K Houston
    BMC Family Practice, 15
  • [27] Cannabis for pain: a cross-sectional survey of the patient information quality on the Internet
    Ng, Jeremy Y.
    Dzisiak, Darragh A.
    Saini, Jessica B.
    JOURNAL OF CANNABIS RESEARCH, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [28] Cannabis for pain: a cross-sectional survey of the patient information quality on the Internet
    Jeremy Y. Ng
    Darragh A. Dzisiak
    Jessica B. Saini
    Journal of Cannabis Research, 3
  • [29] Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey
    Korshakova, Elena
    Marsh, Jessecae K.
    Kleinberg, Samantha
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (09)
  • [30] DOES PATIENT-PROVIDER COMMUNICATION INFLUENCE PATIENT'S RATINGS OF HEALTH CARE QUALITY?
    Kakade, A.
    Sam, Z.
    Dutta, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A45 - A45