R&D and firm performance in the semiconductor industry

被引:42
|
作者
Shin, Namchul [1 ]
Kraemer, Kenneth L. [2 ]
Dedrick, Jason [3 ]
机构
[1] Pace Univ, Seidenberg Sch Comp Sci & Informat Syst, New York, NY 10038 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Patil Merage Sch Business, Irvine, CA USA
[3] Syracuse Univ, Sch Informat Studies, New York, NY USA
关键词
Innovation; firm performance; semiconductor industry; vertical disintegration; fabless firms; vertically integrated firms; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1080/13662716.2016.1224708
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
While the semiconductor industry is still dominated by large vertically integrated firms, fabless firms, which outsource their manufacturing, are gaining market share. Fabless firms are considered to have an advantage in product innovation, as they can focus their innovation efforts on chip design and can benefit from investments in process innovation made by their manufacturing partners, However, there is little empirical evidence of the performance of fabless firms compared to vertically integrated firms. This research empirically examines the relationship between R&D and the financial performance of fabless and vertically integrated firms from 2000 to 2010. Our results show that fabless firms maintain higher gross and net margins, earn a higher return on assets (ROA) and have greater intangible value (Tobin's q) than vertically integrated firms when controlling for size, capital intensity and R&D ratio (R&D/sales). This supports the argument that fabless firms achieve greater performance by focusing on one part of the innovation process. The relationship of R&D ratio to net margin is negative for the whole sample, suggesting that the industry may be overinvesting in R&D. Notably, the negative relationship is greater for fabless firms, which spend a higher amount of their sales on R&D. The relationship of R&D ratio to ROA and Tobin's q is negative, and there is no significant difference between fabless and integrated firms. We conclude that fabless firms outperform integrated firms overall, but are somewhat worse in terms of increasing profits and creating value from their R&D investments.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 297
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Benchmarking R&D in the Semiconductor Industry Using DEA
    Neshati, Ramin
    2013 PROCEEDINGS OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN THE IT-DRIVEN SERVICES (PICMET'13), 2013, : 2749 - 2756
  • [22] Firm density and industry R&D intensity: Theory and evidence
    Lee, CY
    REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2003, 22 (02) : 139 - 158
  • [23] R&D and firm size in the information and telecommunicatons industry of Korea
    Kim, PR
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2000, 15 (03) : 183 - 192
  • [24] R&D cooperation in a three-firm Cournot industry
    Kabiraj, Abhishek
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2018, 38 (03): : 1541 - 1546
  • [25] The R&D Effect on Firm Value in the Information Technology Industry
    Lyroudi, Katerina
    BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE IN SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE, 2022, : 225 - 242
  • [26] R&D and Firm Size in the Information and Telecommunicatons Industry of Korea
    P. R. Kim
    Small Business Economics, 2000, 15 : 183 - 192
  • [27] R&D spending, strategic position and firm performance
    Guo, Bing
    Wang, Jing
    Wei, Steven X.
    FRONTIERS OF BUSINESS RESEARCH IN CHINA, 2018, 12 (01)
  • [28] Firm performance and R&D cooperation: what matters?
    Cantabene, Claudia
    Grassi, Iacopo
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 33 (01) : 142 - 165
  • [29] R&D activity and firm performance: mapping the field
    Boiko, Kseniia
    MANAGEMENT REVIEW QUARTERLY, 2022, 72 (04) : 1051 - 1087
  • [30] R&D capital, ambidexterity innovation, and firm performance
    Li B.
    Yin J.
    Su Y.
    Harbin Gongcheng Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2019, 40 (03): : 634 - 640