Superion® InterSpinous Spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial

被引:18
|
作者
Patel, Vikas V. [1 ]
Nunley, Pierce D. [2 ]
Whang, Peter G. [3 ]
Haley, Thomas R. [4 ]
Bradley, W. Daniel [5 ]
Davis, Raphael P. [6 ]
Block, Jon E.
Geisler, Fred H. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Hosp, Spine Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[2] Spine Inst Louisiana, Shreveport, LA USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Performance Spine & Sports Phys PC, Pottstown, PA USA
[5] Texas Back Inst, Denton, TX USA
[6] Stony Brook Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Stony Brook, NY USA
[7] McLaren Hosp, Petoskey, MI USA
来源
关键词
InterSpinous Spacer; lumbar spinal stenosis; Superion (R); neurogenic claudication; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.2147/JPR.S92633
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This report provides the 3-year clinical outcomes from the randomized, controlled US Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial of the Superion (R) for the treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patients and methods: The Superion (R) was evaluated in the treatment of subjects aged 45 years or older suffering from symptoms of intermittent neurogenic claudication, secondary to a confirmed diagnosis of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis at one or two contiguous levels from L1 to L5. Patients were treated between June 2008 and December 2011 at 31 investigational sites. Three hundred ninety-one subjects were included in the randomized study group consisting of 190 Superion (R) and 201 X-STOP (R) control subjects. The primary composite endpoint was individual patient success based on four components: improvement in two of three domains of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, no reoperations at the index level, no major implant/ procedure-related complications, and no clinically significant confounding treatments. Results: At 3 years, the proportion of subjects achieving the primary composite endpoint was greater for Superion (R) (63/ 120, 52.5%) than for X-STOP (R) (49/ 129, 38.0%) (P=0.023) and the corresponding success rates exceeded 80% for each of the individual components of the primary endpoint in the Superion (R) group (range: 81%-91%). Improvements in back and leg pain severity as well as back-and disease-specific functional outcomes were also maintained through 36 months. Conclusion: The 3-year outcomes from this randomized controlled trial demonstrate durable clinical improvement consistently across all clinical outcomes for the Superion (R) in the treatment of patients with moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 662
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Results in the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective analysis
    Feldmann, J.
    Koenig, F. A.
    Schultz, W.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2007, 145 (06): : 729 - 735
  • [32] Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Rodrigues, Luiz Claudio Lacerda
    Natour, Jamil
    ADVANCES IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 61 (01)
  • [33] Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Luiz Claudio Lacerda Rodrigues
    Jamil Natour
    Advances in Rheumatology, 61
  • [34] The MOTION study: Two-year results of a real-world randomized controlled trial of the mild® procedure for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
    Deer, Timothy R.
    Chafin, Timothy B.
    Costandi, Shrif J.
    Qu, Huaguang
    Kim, Christopher
    Jassal, Navdeep
    Patel, Kiran
    Calodney, Aaron
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2024, 24 (01) : 109 - 119
  • [35] Acupuncture vs Noninsertive Sham Acupuncture in Aging Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Qin, Zongshi
    Ding, Yulong
    Xu, Chang
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Ji, Yuan
    Wu, Aimin
    Wu, Jiani
    Liu, Zhishun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 133 (04): : 500 - +
  • [36] Two-Year Results of X-Stop Interspinous Implant for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Prospective Study
    Nandakumar, Anjali
    Clark, Natasha A.
    Smith, Francis W.
    Wardlaw, Douglas
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2013, 26 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [37] RETRACTED: Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP-a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies (Retracted Article)
    Zhao, He
    Duan, Li-Jun
    Gao, Yu-Shan
    Yang, Yong-Dong
    Zhao, Ding-Yan
    Tang, Xiang-Sheng
    Hu, Zhen-guo
    Li, Chuan-Hong
    Chen, Si-Xue
    Liu, Tao
    Yu, Xing
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [38] Impact of Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities on Access to Interspinous Spacer for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Nationwide Medicare Analysis
    Cho, Annie M.
    Tran, Oth
    McGovern, Alysha M.
    Chan, Kheng Sze
    Yong, Robert Jason
    JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2024,
  • [39] Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: A multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up
    Puzzilli, Fabrizio
    Gazzeri, Roberto
    Galarza, Marcelo
    Neroni, Massimiliano
    Panagiotopoulos, Konstantinos
    Bolognini, Andrea
    Callovini, Giorgio
    Agrillo, Umberto
    Alfieri, Alex
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 124 : 166 - 174
  • [40] Two-year results of interspinous spacer (X-Stop) implantation in 175 patients with neurologic intermittent claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis
    Johannes Kuchta
    Rolf Sobottke
    Peer Eysel
    Patrick Simons
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 823 - 829