Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation

被引:22
|
作者
Ilg, Christiane [1 ]
Oertli, Beat [1 ]
机构
[1] HES SO Univ Appl Sci & Arts Western Switzerland, 150 Route Presinge, CH-1254 Jussey, Switzerland
关键词
aquatic plants; community congruence; conservation value; cross-taxon congruence; habitat prioritization; macroinvertebrates; Mantel test; surrogacy; CROSS-TAXON CONGRUENCE; SPECIES RICHNESS; COMMUNITY SIMILARITY; TEMPORARY WETLANDS; RAPID ASSESSMENT; INDICATOR TAXA; INDEX IBEM; CONCORDANCE; PATTERNS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12802
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Amphibian decline has led to worldwide conservation efforts, including the identification and designation of sites for their protection. These sites could also play an important role in the conservation of other freshwater taxa. In 89 ponds in Switzerland, we assessed the effectiveness of amphibians as a surrogate for 4 taxonomic groups that occur in the same freshwater ecosystems as amphibians: dragonflies, aquatic beetles, aquatic gastropods, and aquatic plants. The ponds were all of high value for amphibian conservation. Cross-taxon correlations were tested for species richness and conservation value, and Mantel tests were used to investigate community congruence. Species richness, conservation value, and community composition of amphibians were weakly congruent with these measures for the other taxonomic groups. Paired comparisons for the 5 groups considered showed that for each metric, amphibians had the lowest degree of congruence. Our results imply that site designation for amphibian conservation will not necessarily provide protection for freshwater biodiversity as a whole. To provide adequate protection for freshwater species, we recommend other taxonomic groups be considered in addition to amphibians in the prioritization and site designation process.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 445
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improving biodiversity surrogates for conservation assessment: A test of methods and the value of targeted biological surveys
    Ware, Chris
    Williams, Kristen J.
    Harding, Jo
    Hawkins, Brian
    Harwood, Thomas
    Manion, Glenn
    Perkins, Genevieve C.
    Ferrier, Simon
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2018, 24 (09) : 1333 - 1346
  • [32] When the suit does not fit biodiversity: Loose surrogates compromise the achievement of conservation goals
    Hermoso, Virgilio
    Januchowski-Hartley, Stephanie R.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 159 : 197 - 205
  • [33] Behavior in a Changing Landscape: Using Movement Ecology to Inform the Conservation of Pond-Breeding Amphibians
    Joly, Pierre
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 7
  • [34] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROTECTED AREAS IN BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION: THE CASE OF TURKEY
    Birben, Ustuner
    CERNE, 2019, 25 (04) : 424 - 438
  • [35] Effectiveness of Marine Protected Areas in the Philippines for Biodiversity Conservation
    Weeks, Rebecca
    Russ, Garry R.
    Alcala, Angel C.
    White, Alan T.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 531 - 540
  • [36] Assessment techniques for biodiversity surrogates
    Reyers, B
    van Jaarsveld, AS
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2000, 96 (07) : 406 - 408
  • [37] Effectiveness of Biological Surrogates for Predicting Patterns of Marine Biodiversity: A Global Meta-Analysis
    Mellin, Camille
    Delean, Steve
    Caley, Julian
    Edgar, Graham
    Meekan, Mark
    Pitcher, Roland
    Przeslawski, Rachel
    Williams, Alan
    Bradshaw, Corey
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06):
  • [38] Effectiveness of land classes as surrogates for species in conservation planning for the Cape Floristic Region
    Lombard, AT
    Cowling, RM
    Pressey, RL
    Rebelo, AG
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 112 (1-2) : 45 - 62
  • [39] Use of Habitats as Surrogates of Biodiversity for Efficient Coral Reef Conservation Planning in Pacific Ocean Islands
    Dalleau, Mayeul
    Andrefouet, Serge
    Wabnitz, Colette C. C.
    Payri, Claude
    Wantiez, Laurent
    Pichon, Michel
    Friedman, Kim
    Vigliola, Laurent
    Benzoni, Francesca
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2010, 24 (02) : 541 - 552
  • [40] Spatial conservation priorities are highly sensitive to choice of biodiversity surrogates and species distribution model type
    Lentini, Pia E.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    ECOGRAPHY, 2015, 38 (11) : 1101 - 1111