Psychometric Properties of Three New National Survey of Student Engagement Based Engagement Scales: An Item Response Theory Analysis

被引:24
作者
Carle, Adam C. [1 ]
Jaffee, David [2 ]
Vaughan, Neil W. [1 ]
Eder, Douglas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Florida, Dept Psychol, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Univ N Florida, Acad Affairs, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[3] Univ N Florida, Inst Effectiveness, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
关键词
Student engagement; Item response theory; Test reliability; Measurement; Transformational learning; Community learning; Student faculty interaction; GOODNESS-OF-FIT; OUTCOMES; NSSE;
D O I
10.1007/s11162-009-9141-z
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We sought to develop and psychometrically describe three new student engagement scales to measure college students' engagement with their faculty (student-faculty engagement: SFE), community-based activities (CBA), and transformational learning opportunities (TLO) using items selected from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE), a widely used, standardized student engagement survey. We used confirmatory factor analysis for ordered-categorical measures, item response theory (IRT), and data from 941 US college students' NSSE responses. Our findings indicated acceptable construct validity. The scales measured related but separable areas of engagement. IRT demonstrated that scores on the student-faculty engagement scale offered the most precise measurement in the middle range of student-faculty engagement. The CBA scale most reliably measured above average engagement, while TLO scores provided relatively precise descriptions of engagement across this spectrum. Findings support these scales' utility in institutional efforts to describe "local" student engagement, as well as efforts to use these scales in cross-institutional comparisons.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 794
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]  
*NSSE, 2006, NSSE 2006 COD
[32]   Further investigation of the performance of S-X2:: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models [J].
Orlando, M ;
Thissen, D .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 27 (04) :289-298
[33]  
Orlando M, 2000, APPL PSYCH MEAS, V24, P48
[34]  
Pace C.R., 1984, MEASURING QUALITY CO
[35]  
Pedhazur E.J., 1991, MEASUREMENT DESIGN A
[36]   The dependability of NSSE scalelets for college- and department-level assessment [J].
Pike, Gary R. .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 47 (02) :177-195
[37]   The convergent and discriminant validity of NSSE scalelet scores [J].
Pike, Gary R. .
JOURNAL OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 47 (05) :550-563
[38]  
SAMEJIMA F, 1969, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V34, P1
[39]   Monte Carlo based null distribution for an alternative goodness-of-fit test statistic in IRT models [J].
Stone, CA .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 37 (01) :58-75
[40]   Assessing goodness of fit of item response theory models: A comparison of traditional and alternative procedures [J].
Stone, CA ;
Zhang, B .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 40 (04) :331-352