Improved Accuracy in the 2-D/1-D Method with Anisotropic Transverse Leakage and Cross-Section Homogenization

被引:5
|
作者
Jarrett, Michael [1 ]
Kochunas, Brendan [1 ]
Larsen, Edward [1 ]
Downar, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Nucl Engn & Radiol Sci, 2355 Bonisteel, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Transport; Two-Dimensional (2-D)/One-Dimensional (1-D) method; MPACT; NEUTRON-TRANSPORT; BENCHMARK;
D O I
10.1080/00295639.2018.1507186
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The Two-Dimensional (2-D)/One-Dimensional (1-D) method allows pin-resolved computational transport solutions for large, full-core light water reactor simulations at relatively low computational cost compared to a true three-dimensional (3-D) transport method. The 2-D/1-D method constructs an approximation to the 3-D transport equation with (1) a 2-D transport equation in the radial variables x and y, discretized on a fine radial spatial grid, and (2) a 1-D transport (or approximate P-N) equation in the axial variable z, discretized on a radially coarse spatial grid. The 2-D and 1-D equations are coupled through transverse leakage (TL) terms. In this paper, a new 2-D/1-D P-3 method with anisotropic transverse leakages and anisotropic homogenized 1-D cross sections (XSs) is proposed to improve the accuracy of conventional 2-D/1-D with pin homogenization. It is shown that only the polar component of the anisotropic homogenized XS has a significant effect on the solution; the azimuthal component is negligible. However, the polar and azimuthal components of the leakage terms are both important. The new method is implemented in the 2-D/1-D code Michigan PArallel Characteristics Transport (MPACT). The method in this paper is shown to achieve nearly 3-D transport accuracy with sufficient refinement in space and angle. The improvement of this new method compared to the previous 2-D/1-D method in MPACT is most notable in problems with strong axial leakage and sharp axial discontinuities, such as control rod tips or part-length rods. The method is computationally more expensive than the existing 2-D/1-D method with isotropic TL and XSs, but this additional cost may be justified when the axial flux shape does not vary smoothly due to axial heterogeneity and needs to be resolved well.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 239
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 1-D and 2-D Uranium(VI) Coordination Polymers
    Vujovic, Dejana
    Nassimbeni, Luigi R.
    Raubenheimer, Helgard G.
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA A-FOUNDATION AND ADVANCES, 2005, 61 : C307 - C307
  • [22] A New 1-D Model for Singular 2-D Systems
    Azarakhsh, Kamyar
    Shafiee, Masoud
    2021 29TH IRANIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (ICEE), 2021, : 607 - 612
  • [23] A theoretical study of 1-D and 2-D helium lattices
    Sabzyan, Hassan
    Zanjanchio, Farzaneh
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 54 (02) : 303 - 312
  • [25] CURVATURE EFFECTS IN 1-D AND 2-D JOSEPHSON JUNCTIONS
    Dobrowolski, Tomasz
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOMETRY, INTEGRABILITY AND QUANTIZATION, 2016, : 182 - 195
  • [26] 1-D and 2-D photonic bandgap microstrip structures
    Falcone, F
    Lopetegi, T
    Sorolla, M
    MICROWAVE AND OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 1999, 22 (06) : 411 - 412
  • [27] AMBLYOPIC SENSITIVITY TO 1-D AND 2-D SPATIAL PHASE
    WEISS, C
    RENTSCHLER, I
    STRASBURGER, H
    PERCEPTION, 1983, 12 (01) : A21 - A21
  • [28] 1-D and 2-D transforms from integers to integers
    Wang, J
    Sun, J
    Yu, SY
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL II, PROCEEDINGS: SPEECH II; INDUSTRY TECHNOLOGY TRACKS; DESIGN & IMPLEMENTATION OF SIGNAL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2003, : 549 - 552
  • [29] FORMULATION OF 2-D NORMAL EQUATIONS USING 2-D TO 1-D FORM PRESERVING TRANSFORMATIONS
    RAJAN, PK
    REDDY, HC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1988, 36 (03): : 414 - 417
  • [30] 1-D AND 1 1/2-D PROFILE CALCULATIONS IN TOROIDAL PLASMAS
    BAXTER, DC
    BYRNE, RN
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1982, 41 : 319 - 319