A multicenter, cross-platform clinical validation study of cancer cytogenomic arrays

被引:11
|
作者
Li, Marilyn M. [1 ]
Monzon, Federico A. [1 ]
Biegel, Jaclyn A. [2 ]
Jobanputra, Vaidehi [3 ]
Laffin, Jennifer J. [4 ]
Levy, Brynn [3 ]
Leon, Annette [5 ]
Miron, Patricia [6 ]
Rossi, Michael R. [7 ]
Toruner, Gokce [8 ]
Alvarez, Karla [1 ]
Doho, Gregory [7 ]
Dougherty, Margaret J. [2 ]
Hu, Xiaofeng [1 ]
Kash, Shera [9 ]
Streck, Deanna [8 ]
Znoyko, Iya [10 ]
Hagenkord, Jill M. [9 ]
Wolff, Daynna J. [10 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[5] GenPath, Bioreference Labs, Elmwood Park, NJ USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts, Worcester, MA 01605 USA
[7] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[8] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[9] Creighton Univ, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[10] Med Univ S Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
Cancer Genomics Consortium; Cancer cytogenomic microarray; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Myelodysplastic syndrome; Renal epithelial tumor; CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA; COPY NUMBER ALTERATIONS; PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUES; RENAL-CELL CANCER; MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES; MICROARRAY; CLASSIFICATION; ABERRATIONS; SURVIVAL; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.08.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cytogenomic microarray analysis (CMA) offers high resolution, genome-wide copy number information and is widely used in clinical laboratories for diagnosis of constitutional abnormalities. The Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC) conducted a multiplatform, multicenter clinical validation project to compare the reliability and inter- and intralaboratory reproducibility of this technology for clinical oncology applications. Four specimen types were processed on three different microarray platforms-from Affymetrix, Agilent, and Illumina. Each microarray platform was employed at two independent test sites. The results were compared in a blinded manner with current standard methods, including karyotype, FISH, or morphology. Twenty-nine chronic lymphocytic leukemia blood, 34 myelodysplastic syndrome bone marrow, and 30 fresh frozen renal epithelial tumor samples were assessed by all six laboratories. Thirty formalin fixed paraffin embedded renal tumor samples were analyzed at the Affymetrix and Agilent test sites only. All study samples were initial diagnostic samples. Array data were analyzed at each participating site and were submitted to caArray for central analysis. Laboratory interpretive results were submitted to the central analysis team for comparison with the standard-of-care assays and for calculation of intraplatform reproducibility and cross-platform concordance. The results demonstrated that the three microarray platforms 1) detect clinically actionable genomic changes in cancer compatible to standard-of-care methods; 2) further define cytogenetic aberrations; 3) identify submicroscopic alterations and loss of heterozygosity (LOH); and 4) yield consistent results within and between laboratories. Based on this study, the CGC concludes that CMA is a sensitive and reliable technique for copy number and LOH assessment that may be used for clinical oncology genomic analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 536
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cross-platform and cross-interaction study of user personality based on images on Twitter and Flickr
    Samani, Zahra Riahi
    Guntuku, Sharath Chandra
    Moghaddam, Mohsen Ebrahimi
    Preatiuc-Pietro, Daniel
    Ungar, Lyle H.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [42] A study on the cross-platform influence mechanism of physicians' live streaming behavior on performance
    Chen, Chen
    Wu, Hong
    INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 35 (01) : 80 - 104
  • [43] Identification of lncRNA biomarkers for lung cancer through integrative cross-platform data analyses
    Zhao, Tianying
    Khadka, Vedbar Singh
    Deng, Youping
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (14): : 14506 - 14527
  • [44] Ecological Impact of Native versus Cross-Platform Mobile Apps: a Preliminary Study
    Frattaroli, Vincent
    Le Goaer, Olivier
    Philippot, Olivier
    2023 38TH IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS, ASEW, 2023, : 3 - 8
  • [45] Test Driven Development in Action: Case Study of a Cross-Platform Web Application
    Pombo, Nuno
    Martins, Caio
    IEEE EUROCON 2021 - 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, : 352 - 356
  • [46] Cross-Platform Analysis of Mammography Narratives: A Comparative Study on Social Media Engagement
    Stirrat, Thomas
    Garner, Jonathan
    Tailor, Parth
    Weitz, Daniel
    Umair, Muhammad
    Akpolat, Yusuf T.
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-CENTERED RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [47] Wide Angle Imaging Lidar (WAIL): Theory of operation, cross-platform validation, and potential applications.
    Polonsky, IN
    Davis, AB
    Love, SP
    LIDAR REMOTE SENSING FOR INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING V, 2005, 5653 : 109 - 120
  • [48] Sparse canonical methods for biological data integration: application to a cross-platform study
    Le Cao, Kim-Anh
    Martin, Pascal G. P.
    Robert-Granie, Christele
    Besse, Philippe
    BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2009, 10
  • [49] The Study of Simulation for Nucleosome Distribution Based on Cross-platform Positioning Data in the Yeast
    Feng, Ji-hua
    Chen, Yue-bin
    Yin, Shi-Tang
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATION (FCSA 2011), VOL 1, 2011, : 555 - 558
  • [50] Molecular classification of lung cancer - A cross-platform comparison of gene expression data sets
    Parmigiani, G
    Garrett, E
    Anbazhagan, B
    Gabrielson, E
    CHEST, 2004, 125 (05) : 103S - 103S