The distribution of FGFR3 mutations in bladder tumors of different stages

被引:0
|
作者
Bresam, Sabah [1 ]
Altae, Bashar Ouda [2 ]
AlFaisal, Abdul Hussein M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Baghdad, Accommodat Dept, Baghdad, Iraq
[2] Univ Babylon, Hammurabi Med Coll, Babylon, Iraq
[3] Univ Baghdad, Inst Genet Engn & Biotechnol Postgrad Studies, Baghdad, Iraq
来源
BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH | 2019年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
FGFR3; TCC; Ta; T1-T3; mutations; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR-3; CANCER; EXPRESSION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) could represent a promising biomarker for bladder cancer. Current study consisted of 95 subjects with bladder cancer (Transitional cells carcinoma TCC) and 50 subjects control group. Patient age ranged from 30 to 86 years while control subjects ages ranged from 30 to 50 years. Mutations of FGFR3 genes were analyzed in 101 patients with transitional cell bladder cancer included 61(67%) male and 40(44%) female. 43 of 101 patients have mutations. 15(35.7%) of mutations shown in FGFR3 exon 7 and 27(64.3%) were in exon 10. These mutations affected codons g.13509, g.13501 of exon 7 and codons g.16021, g.16025 of exon 10. FGFR3 mutations were observed in 13(%) Ta tumors, 10(%) T1, 8(%) T2 and 11(%) T3 of 42 mutations. The occurrence of FGFR3 mutations with respect to tumor stage revealed the presence of a FGFR3 mutation in low stage tumors than high-stage tumors. These results indicate that a significant correlation was found between FGFR3 mutations and low grade.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 101
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic significance of FGFR3 mutations in high risk superficial bladder cancer
    Zieger, Karsten
    Dyrskjot, Lars
    Viuf, Carsten
    Moller, Klaus
    Orntoft, Torben F.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (08)
  • [22] Re: Mutations in TERT Promoter and FGFR3 and Telomere Length in Bladder Cancer
    Atala, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : 1168 - +
  • [23] Detection of FGFR3 mutations and fusions in bladder cancer samples: Comparison of the MODAPLEX FGFR panel with therascreen FGFR Kit
    Weissbach, R.
    Wirtz, R. M.
    Weber, A.
    Schubert, T.
    Waldner, M.
    Veltrup, E.
    Hake, R.
    Eidt, S.
    Graff, J.
    Grunwald, V.
    Ecke, T.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2024, 485 : S137 - S137
  • [24] FGFR3 mutations in prostate cancer: association with low-grade tumors
    Hernandez, Silvia
    de Muga, Silvia
    Agell, Laia
    Juanpere, Nuria
    Esgueva, Raquel
    Lorente, Jose A.
    Mojal, Sergi
    Serrano, Sergio
    Lloreta, Josep
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 (06) : 848 - 856
  • [25] Low frequency of chromosomal alterations in CGH analysis in low-risk papillary bladder tumors with FGFR3 mutations
    Junker, K.
    Van Oers, J.
    Zwarthoff, E.
    Kania, I.
    Schubert, J.
    Hartmann, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2006, 5 (14) : 799 - 799
  • [26] Low frequency of chromosomal alterations in CGH analysis in low-risk papillary bladder tumors with FGFR3 mutations
    Junker, Kerstin
    Van Oers, Johanna
    Zwarthoff, Ellen
    Kania, Ines
    Schubert, Joerg
    Hartmann, Arndt
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 66 (08)
  • [27] Low frequency of chromosomal alterations in CGH analysis in low-rish: Papillary bladder tumors with FGFR3 mutations
    Junker, Kerstin
    van Oers, Johanna
    Hartmann, Amdt
    Kania, Ines
    Schubert, Joerg
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 258 - 258
  • [28] FGFR3 mutations as novel oncogenic targets
    Cardona, Gabriela Martinez
    Gaffney, Dana
    Bell, Katherine
    Portale, Joseph
    Dunworth, Matthew
    Lorenzi, Matthew
    Platero, Suso
    Karkera, Jayaprakash
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [29] Mutations of TERT promoter and FGFR3 in urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder in Korean patients
    Choi, C.
    Kim, S-S.
    Byeun, J-Y.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2017, 471 : S279 - S279
  • [30] No Evidence of FGFR3 Mutations in Prostate Cancer
    Zuiverloon, Tahlita C. M.
    Boormans, Joost L.
    Trapman, Jan
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    Zwarthoff, Ellen C.
    PROSTATE, 2011, 71 (06): : 637 - 641