Intensification to biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30, NovoMix® 30) can improve glycaemic control in patients treated with basal insulins: a subgroup analysis of the IMPROVE™ observational study

被引:36
|
作者
Gumprecht, J. [1 ]
Benroubi, M. [2 ]
Borzi, V. [3 ]
Kawamori, R. [4 ]
Shaban, J. [5 ]
Shah, S. [6 ]
Shestakova, M. [7 ]
Wenying, Y. [8 ]
Ligthelm, R. [9 ]
Valensi, P.
机构
[1] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Internal Dis Diabetol & Nephrol, Zabrze, Poland
[2] Gen Hosp Athens POLYKLIN, Ctr Diabet, Athens, Greece
[3] Vittorio Emanuele Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Catania, Italy
[4] Juntendo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Tokyo 113, Japan
[5] Windsor Reg Hosp, Windsor, ON, Canada
[6] Bhatia Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
[7] Fed Sci Ctr Endocrinol, Inst Diabet, Moscow, Russia
[8] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[9] EHM Clin, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
PLUS METFORMIN; TYPE-2; THERAPY; ANALOG;
D O I
10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02064.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The international IMPROVE (TM) observational study investigated the safety profile and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in the routine treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. We present analyses for the subgroup of patients who switched from basal insulin to BIAsp 30. Patients in routine care who started insulin therapy with or switched to BIAsp 30 from existing insulin regimens were eligible for this 26-week study. This analysis includes only patients previously treated with basal insulin. Outcomes including adverse events, hypoglycaemic events and glycaemic profile were recorded from patients' notes, recall and diaries. Of the 748 patients included (age 59.7 +/- 11.8 years, diabetes duration 11.4 +/- 7.3 years, baseline HbA(1c) 9.1 +/- 1.6%), 497 were previously using human neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and 245 analogue basal insulin. Overall, major and minor hypoglycaemia rates decreased from baseline to final visit (major: 0.171 to 0.011; minor: 9.70 to 5.89 events/patient-year) and were similar between the subgroups. HbA(1c) and fasting blood glucose were significantly reduced from baseline (NPH prestudy: -1.6%, -2.4 mmol/l; analogue basal prestudy: -1.8%, -2.4 mmol/l), as was postprandial blood glucose, with 33.8% of patients achieving the HbA(1c) target < 7% without hypoglycaemia. Insulin dose increased slightly from prestudy (0.33 +/- 0.21 U/kg), baseline (0.40 +/- 0.20 U/kg) to final visit (0.52 +/- 0.26 U/kg); most patients (76%) followed a twice-daily regimen at final visit. Body weight did not change significantly and treatment satisfaction increased. Patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulins may improve their glycaemic control by intensification to BIAsp 30 therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:966 / 972
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A 32-Week Randomized Comparison of Stepwise Insulin Intensification of Biphasic Insulin Aspart (BIAsp 30) Versus Basal-Bolus Therapy in Insulin-Naive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Linjawi, Sultan
    Lee, Byung-Wan
    Tabak, A-mur
    Lovdahl, Susanna
    Werther, Shanti
    Abusnana, Salahedeen
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [42] Baseline characteristics of the Indian cohort from the IMPROVE™ study: a multinational, observational study of biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment for type 2 diabetes
    Shah, Siddharth
    Das, A. K.
    Kumar, Ajay
    Unnikrishnan, A. G.
    Kalra, Sanjay
    Baruah, M. P.
    Ganapathi, B.
    Sahay, R. K.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2009, 26 (03) : 325 - 335
  • [43] Baseline characteristics of the Indian cohort from the IMPROVE™ study: a multinational, observational study of biphasic insulin aspart 30 treatment for type 2 diabetes
    Siddharth Shah
    A. K. Das
    Ajay Kumar
    A. G. Unnikrishnan
    Sanjay Kalra
    M. P. Baruah
    B. Ganapathi
    R. K. Sahay
    Advances in Therapy, 2009, 26 : 325 - 335
  • [44] Pharmacokinetic profiles of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 and 70/30 in patients with Type 1 diabetes: a randomized double-blinded crossover study
    Chen, JW
    Lauritzen, T
    Christiansen, JJ
    Jensen, LH
    Clausen, WHO
    Christiansen, JS
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (03) : 273 - 277
  • [45] Patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus have lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia on biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp30) than on biphasic human insulin-30 (BHI30): data from the REACH study
    McNally, PG
    Nelson, G
    Fitch, M
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 : A327 - A327
  • [46] Reduction in Insulin Dose Following Shift from Biphasic Human Insulin to Biphasic Insulin Aspart30/70: Experience from Indian-Cohort of IMPROVE™ Study
    Shah, Siddharth
    Banerjee, Samar
    Lamba, P. S.
    Chakkarwar, Praful N.
    Prusty, Vinay
    Moharana, Ashok Kumar
    Mazumdar, Anirban
    DIABETES, 2009, 58 : A534 - A535
  • [47] A 32-Week Randomized Comparison of Stepwise Insulin Intensification of Biphasic Insulin Aspart (BIAsp 30) Versus Basal–Bolus Therapy in Insulin-Naïve Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Sultan Linjawi
    Byung-Wan Lee
    Ömür Tabak
    Susanna Lövdahl
    Shanti Werther
    Salahedeen Abusnana
    Diabetes Therapy, 2018, 9 : 1 - 11
  • [48] Safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in a Bangladeshi subgroup of type 2 diabetic patients switched from biphasic human insulin 30: A sub-analysis of the A1chieve study
    Latif, Zafar Ahmed
    Pathan, Md. Faruque
    Siddiqui, Md. Nazrul Islam
    Sobhan, Md. Javed
    Rahman, Md. Mahfuzur
    Ashrafuzzaman, S. M.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 100 : S30 - S34
  • [49] Switching patients no longer adequately controlled on basal insulin analog to biphasic insulin aspart 30 offered improved glycemic control
    Kim, Chong Hwa
    Lee, So Ra
    Bech, Ole M.
    DIABETES, 2008, 57 : A162 - A162
  • [50] An observational study on the efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 30 among Korean patients with Type 2 diabetes
    Chul, Jang Hak
    Hee, Choi Sung
    Myung, Yoo Jae
    Han, Kim Jung
    Man, Kim Doo
    Jung, Kim Dae
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2008, 79 : S34 - S34