Mapping the Presidential Election Cycle in US stock markets

被引:27
|
作者
Wong, Wing-Keung [1 ]
McAleer, Michael [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Econ, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Inst Econometr, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Appl Econ, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Presidential Election Cycle; Spectral analysis; EGARCH Intervention model; Stock prices; Returns; MOMENTUM STRATEGIES; STOCHASTIC-DOMINANCE; MONETARY-POLICY; BUSINESS-CYCLE; RETURNS; VOLATILITY; PROFITABILITY; BEHAVIOR; PRICES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matcom.2009.05.007
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper shows that in the almost four decades from January 1965 through to December 2003, US stock prices closely followed the 4-year Presidential Election Cycle. In general, stock prices fell during the first half of a Presidency, reached a trough in the second year, rose during the second half of a Presidency, and reached a peak in the third or fourth year. This cyclical trend is found to hold for the greater part of the last ten administrations, starting from President Lyndon Johnson to the administration of President George W. Bush, particularly when the incumbent is a Republican. The empirical results suggest that the Republican Party may have greater Cause to engage in active policy manipulation to win re-election than their Democratic counterparts. There is irony in that bullish runs in the stock market have tended to coincide with sub-periods under Democratic administrations. The existence of the Presidential Election Cycle shown in the paper may constitute an anomaly in the US stock market, which could be useful for investors. (C) 2009 IMACS. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3267 / 3277
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trolling, hacking and the 2016 US presidential election
    Alexander Klimburg
    Nature, 2018, 562 (7726) : 188 - 189
  • [32] Spatial Model of US Presidential Election in 2012
    Kim, Jeong Hyun
    Schofield, Norman
    POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SOCIAL CHOICES, 2016, : 233 - 241
  • [33] The Social Psychology of the 2008 US Presidential Election
    Lanning, Kevin
    Maruyama, Geoffrey
    ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2010, 10 (01) : 171 - 181
  • [34] Driving fatalities on US presidential election days
    Redelmeier, Donald A.
    Tibshirani, Robert J.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 300 (13): : 1518 - 1520
  • [35] The 2008 US presidential election: Obama and the environment
    Bomberg, Elizabeth
    Super, Betsy
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2009, 18 (03) : 424 - 430
  • [36] The 2008 US presidential election: A look at the candidates
    Ballantyne, Coco
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2008, 14 (10) : 1000 - 1000
  • [37] Commentary: The 2020 US Presidential Election and Immigration
    Martin, Susan F.
    INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2020, 58 (05) : 274 - 276
  • [38] A Bayesian Prediction Model for the US Presidential Election
    Rigdon, Steven E.
    Jacobson, Sheldon H.
    Cho, Wendy K. Tam
    Sewell, Edward C.
    Rigdon, Christopher J.
    AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 (04) : 700 - 724
  • [39] Terrorism, gender, and the 2016 US presidential election
    Holman, Mirya R.
    Merolla, Jennifer L.
    Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.
    Wang, Ding
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2019, 61
  • [40] The National Debt in the 2012 US Presidential Election
    Chin, Alycia
    Cohen, Taya R.
    ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2014, 14 (01) : 105 - 122