Environmental sustainability of small-scale biomass power technologies for agricultural communities in developing countries

被引:71
|
作者
Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail [1 ,2 ]
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro [1 ,3 ]
Azapagic, Adisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Chem Engn & Analyt Sci, Sustainable Ind Syst, Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Philippines, Dept Chem Engn, CP Garcia Ave, Quezon City 1101, Philippines
[3] Univ Manchester, Sch Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Pariser Bldg,Sackville St, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Biomass electricity; Rural electrification; Agricultural waste; Gasification; Anaerobic digestion; Combustion; Life cycle assessment (LCA); LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; RICE STRAW; RURAL ELECTRIFICATION; GASIFICATION; ENERGY; BIOENERGY; SYSTEMS; GENERATION; EMISSIONS; DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.036
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural wastes are readily available in farming communities and can be utilised for off-grid electrification as an alternative to diesel generators. This work evaluates for the first time the life cycle environmental sustainability of these small-scale systems in the context of Southeast Asia. Rice and coconut residues are considered for direct combustion and gasification, and livestock manure for anaerobic digestion. Overall, anaerobic digestion is the best option for 14 out of 18 impacts estimated through life cycle assessment. The results also suggest that gasification has up to 12 times lower impacts per kWh than combustion, except for resource depletion. Combustion and gasification have 85% to two times lower impacts than diesel generators, except for eutrophication, ecotoxicity and human toxicity. Depending on the feedstock, global warming potential of anaerobic digestion ranges from being 170% lower to 41% higher than that of the diesel generator. Overall, providing power from residual biomass in small agricultural communities would reduce environmental impacts significantly while improving waste management practices. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 506
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Small-scale processing of biomass for biorefinery
    Bruins, Marieke E.
    Sanders, Johan P. M.
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (02): : 135 - 145
  • [42] SMALL-SCALE DISTRIBUTIONS OF ZOOPLANKTON BIOMASS
    GREENBLATT, PR
    SHULENBERGER, E
    WORMUTH, JH
    DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART A-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PAPERS, 1982, 29 (04): : 443 - 457
  • [43] Operationalizing an ecosystem approach to small-scale fisheries in developing countries: The case of Uruguay
    Gianelli, I.
    Horta, S.
    Martinez, G.
    de la Rosa, A.
    Defeo, O.
    MARINE POLICY, 2018, 95 : 180 - 188
  • [44] SMALL-SCALE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN HUNGARY
    OROS, I
    ACTA OECONOMICA, 1984, 32 (1-2) : 65 - 90
  • [45] SMALL-SCALE FOOD-INDUSTRIES - IMPROVING PERFORMANCE IN DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES
    BOEHOCANSEY, O
    FOOD POLICY, 1988, 13 (04) : 334 - 337
  • [47] Small-scale mining and its socio-economic impact in developing countries
    Hilson, Gavin
    Natural Resources Forum, 2002, 26 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [49] A Methodological Approach to Evaluate Livestock Innovations on Small-Scale Farms in Developing Countries
    Garcia-Martinez, Anton
    Rivas-Rangel, Jose
    Rangel-Quintos, Jaime
    Antonio Espinosa, Jose
    Barba, Cecilio
    de-Pablos-Heredero, Carmen
    FUTURE INTERNET, 2016, 8 (02):