THE MANCHESTER-FOTHERGILL PROCEDURE VERSUS VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF UTERINE PROLAPSE: AN ACTIVITY BASED COSTING ANALYSIS

被引：0
|
作者：
Husby, K. [1 ]
Tolstrup, C. Krogsgaard [1 ]
Lose, G. [1 ]
Klarskov, N. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Herlev & Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Herlev, Denmark
来源：
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL | 2017年 / 28卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号：
100211 ;
摘要：
035
引用
收藏
页码：S32 / S33
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Outcomes of the Manchester Procedure Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse: A Study of the British Society of Urogynaecology Database
    Tan, Albert Chao Chiet
    Latthe, Pallavi
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 35 (07) : 1469 - 1475
  • [42] Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Li
    Feng, Dan
    Zha, Xi
    Liao, Xiao-Yan
    Gong, Zhao-Lin
    Gu, Ding-Qian
    Lin, Yong-Hong
    Huang, Lu
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (07) : 1917 - 1925
  • [43] Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in uterine prolapse surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li He
    Dan Feng
    Xi Zha
    Xiao-Yan Liao
    Zhao-Lin Gong
    Ding-Qian Gu
    Yong-Hong Lin
    Lu Huang
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 1917 - 1925
  • [44] Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study
    Rahmanou, Philip
    Price, Natalia
    Jackson, Simon R.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 26 (11) : 1687 - 1694
  • [45] Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study
    Philip Rahmanou
    Natalia Price
    Simon R. Jackson
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2015, 26 : 1687 - 1694
  • [46] A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO VAGINAL PROCEDURES FOR THE TREATMENT OF STAGE TWO, OR HIGHER UTERINE PROLAPSE: HYSTERECTOMY WITH MESH VERSUS ONLY MESH IMPLANTATION.
    Malandri, M.
    Iordanidou, E.
    Takou, M.
    Moraitis, B.
    Balaxis, D.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2012, 31 (06) : 855 - 855
  • [47] Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses
    de Oliveira, Sofia Andrade
    Bortolini, Maria A. T.
    Castro, Rodrigo A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 28 (11) : 1763 - 1763
  • [48] Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analyses
    Sofia Andrade de Oliveira
    Maria A. T. Bortolini
    Rodrigo A. Castro
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2017, 28 : 1763 - 1763
  • [49] Letter to the Editor: The Outcomes of the Manchester Procedure Versus Sacrospinous Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse: A Study of the British Society of Urogynaecology Database
    Lee, Hsin-Pei
    Lin, Kun-Ling
    Long, Cheng-Yu
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [50] The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension Versus Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial)
    Nager, Charles W.
    Zyczynski, Halina
    Rogers, Rebecca G.
    Barber, Matthew D.
    Richter, Holly E.
    Visco, Anthony G.
    Rardin, Charles R.
    Harvie, Heidi
    Wallace, Dennis
    Meikle, Susan F.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 22 (04): : 182 - 189
12345