Learner support in MOOCs: Identifying variables linked to completion

被引:93
作者
Barbera Gregori, Elena [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jingjing [2 ]
Galvan-Fernandez, Cristina [3 ]
de Asis Fernandez-Navarro, Francisco [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oberta Catalunya, eLearn Ctr, Av Carl Friedrich Gauss 5, Barcelona 08860, Spain
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Educ Technol, Big Data Ctr Technol Mediated Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Barcelona, Campus Mundet,Off 025,Llevant Bldg, Barcelona 08035, Spain
[4] Univ Loyola Andalucia, Dept Quantitat Methods, Seville, Spain
关键词
Distance education; Teleleaming; Learning strategies; Learner support; Dropouts; ONLINE; MACHINE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.014
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This study investigated learner support strategies that enable the success and completion of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). It examined five MOOCs categorised into three groups according to their pedagogical approach and used in different learning settings: formal MOOCs, conventional MOOCs and professional MOOCs. A total of 4,202,974 units of variables (student behaviours and MOOC features) were analysed using Semi-Supervised Extreme Learning Machine (SSELM) and Global Sensitivity Analysis. In this study, the use of SSELM was compared to the state-of-art models (e.g. ELM, KELM, OP-ELM, PCA-ELM), and SSELM yielded 97.24% accuracy. Using unlabelled students helped improve the learning accuracy for the model, which confirms that SSELM is a good model to predict completion in MOOCs, considering the difficulty of labelling students in such an open and flexible learning environment. The findings show that designers and teachers should pay special attention to their students during the second quartile of the course (independently of the type of MOOC). The teachers' presence during the course, his or her interactions with students and the quality of the videos presented are significant determinants of course completion.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 168
页数:16
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]  
Mills R., 2004, RETHINKING LEARNER S
[52]  
MoE, 2015, OP MIN ED STRENGTH A
[53]  
Morrison D., 2013, How NOT to design a MOOC: The disaster at Coursera and how to fix it [Blog post]
[54]  
Onah DFO, 2014, EDULEARN PROC, P5825
[55]  
Ramesh A., 2013, NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education, V2, P1
[56]  
Rullan M., 2014, HACIA NUEVO MODELO D, V2, P1
[57]   Weighting Efficient Accuracy and Minimum Sensitivity for Evolving Multi-Class Classifiers [J].
Sanchez-Monedero, Javier ;
Gutierrez, Pedro A. ;
Fernandez-Navarro, F. ;
Hervas-Martinez, C. .
NEURAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2011, 34 (02) :101-116
[58]  
Sangra A., 2012, INT J LEARN ANN REV, V18, P93, DOI DOI 10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/V18I04/47573
[59]   Massive Open Online Change? Exploring the Discursive Construction of the 'MOOC' in Newspapers [J].
Selwyn, Neil ;
Bulfin, Scott ;
Pangrazio, Luci .
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 69 (02) :175-192
[60]  
Sewart D., 1980, Distance Education, V1, P171, DOI DOI 10.1080/0158791800010204