How pre-service teachers' personality traits, self-efficacy, and discipline strategies contribute to the teacher-student relationship

被引:42
作者
de Jong, Romi [1 ]
Mainhard, Tim [2 ]
van Tartwijk, Jan [2 ]
Veldman, Ietje [1 ]
Verloop, Nico [1 ]
Wubbels, Theo [2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, NL-2300 AX Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
pre-service teachers; secondary education; teacher-student relationship; teachers' self-efficacy; personality traits; discipline strategies; classroom management; gender; CLASSROOM DISCIPLINE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; MANAGEMENT; COMPLEMENTARITY; AUSTRALIA; MODERATOR; STYLES; IMPACT; POWER;
D O I
10.1111/bjep.12025
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundAlthough the teacher-student relationship is a well-documented phenomenon, few attempts have been made to identify its predictors. Research has mainly focused on in-service teachers, less is known about characteristics of pre-service teachers in relation to the teacher-student relationship. AimsThe purpose of this study was to identify the predictors of pre-service secondary teachers' relationships with their students. It was hypothesized that friendliness and extraversion, self-efficacy in classroom management and in student engagement, and various discipline strategies would contribute to the teacher-student relationship in terms of influence and affiliation. SampleA total of 120 pre-service teachers in teacher education programmes participated. MethodData on pre-service teachers' background (e.g., gender and age), personality traits, and self-efficacy were gathered with teacher questionnaires; data on teachers' discipline strategies and the teacher-student relationship with student questionnaires. ResultsThe two personality traits and self-efficacy appeared not to be related to the teacher-student relationship in terms of affiliation or influence. However, significant relationships were found between the different discipline strategies and the teacher-student relationship in terms of influence and affiliation. There were differential effects for gender on the relationship between discipline strategies on the one hand and influence and affiliation on the other. ConclusionThis study provides relevant new insights into the research fields of classroom management and interpersonal relationships in education. It contributes to our understanding of discipline strategies by fine tuning an existing instrument and revealing interesting connections with the teacher-student relationship. Specific gender effects on this connection are discussed, as are implications for practice.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 310
页数:17
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]   RECONCILING CARE AND CONTROL - AUTHORITY IN CLASSROOM RELATIONSHIPS [J].
MCLAUGHLIN, HJ .
JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 1991, 42 (03) :182-195
[52]   Teachers' conflict management styles: The role of attachment styles and classroom management efficacy [J].
Morris-Rothschild, BK ;
Brassard, MR .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (02) :105-121
[53]  
NOBLIT GW, 1993, AM EDUC RES J, V30, P23, DOI 10.3102/00028312030001023
[54]  
Pianta RC, 2006, HANDBOOK OF CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT: RESEARCH, PRACTICE, AND CONTEMPORARY ISSUES, P685
[55]   Conceptualization, Measurement, and Improvement of Classroom Processes: Standardized Observation Can Leverage Capacity [J].
Pianta, Robert C. ;
Hamre, Bridget K. .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2009, 38 (02) :109-119
[56]  
Rasbash J., 2005, MLWIN VERSION 2 02, V2nd
[57]   Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence [J].
Raven, BH ;
Schwarzwald, J ;
Koslowsky, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 28 (04) :307-332
[58]   The carrot, the stick, or the relationship: what are the effective disciplinary strategies? [J].
Roache, Joel Edmund ;
Lewis, Ramon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2011, 34 (02) :233-248
[59]   The Impact of Teachers' Aggressive Management Techniques on Students' Attitudes to Schoolwork [J].
Romi, Shlomo ;
Lewis, Ramon ;
Roache, Joel ;
Riley, Philip .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 104 (04) :231-240
[60]  
Ross J., 2001, The Journal of Educational Research, V101, P50