Factors Affecting Decision-Making Processes in Virtual Teams in the UAE

被引:7
|
作者
Davidaviciene, Vida [1 ]
Majzoub, Khaled Al [1 ]
Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, Ieva [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Business Management Fac, Dept Business Technol & Entrepreneurship, Sauletekio Al 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
information and communications technologies; ICT; virtual organization; virtual teams; decision making processes; performance; LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES; PROJECT TEAMS; PERFORMANCE; TRUST; COMMUNICATION; COLLABORATION; INFORMATION; BEHAVIORS; TEAMWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/info11100490
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Organizational reliance on virtual teams (VTs) is increasing tremendously due to the significant benefits they offer, such as efficiently reaching objectives and increasing organizational performance. However, VTs face a lot of challenges that, if overlooked, will prevent them from yielding the required benefits. One of the major issues that hinders the effectiveness of VTs is the decision-making process. There is a lack of scientific research that attempts to understand the factors affecting decision making processes in VTs. Studies in this area have only been done in the United States and Europe. However, such research has not been conducted in the Middle East, where specific scientific solutions are still required to improve the performance of VTs. Therefore, this study is conducted in the Middle East, namely in the United Arab Emirates, to gain scientific knowledge on this region's specificity. An online questionnaire (Google forms) was used to obtain the necessary data. Hypotheses were developed to test the influence of ICT (Information and communications technologies), language, information sharing, and trust on the decision-making processes, and the effect of decision making on team performance. Structural equational model (SEM) methodology was used to test our proposed model. The results showed that factors such as trust, ICT, and information sharing have a direct effect on decision-making processes, while language has no effect on decision making, and decision-making processes have a direct effect on the performance of the VTs.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A refined model of factors affecting convention participation decision-making
    Zhang, Hanqin Qiu
    Leung, Vivien
    Qu, Hailin
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2007, 28 (04) : 1123 - 1127
  • [22] Factors affecting investment decision-making in Pakistan stock exchange
    Mumtaz, Adeel
    Saeed, Tahir
    Ramzan, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 5 (04)
  • [23] FACTORS AFFECTING DECISION-MAKING IN ECONOMIC-POLICY OF BELGIUM
    MORISSENS, L
    CAHIERS ECONOMIQUES DE BRUXELLES, 1965, (27): : 321 - 416
  • [24] FACTORS AFFECTING THE COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES OF SEQUENTIAL AND BATCHED DECISION-MAKING
    HOFFER, JA
    KENNEDY, MH
    JOURNAL OF CYBERNETICS, 1980, 10 (1-3): : 97 - 115
  • [25] Factors affecting HIV contraceptive decision-making among women
    Wyatt, GE
    Carmona, JV
    Loeb, TB
    Guthrie, D
    Chin, D
    Gordon, G
    SEX ROLES, 2000, 42 (7-8) : 495 - 521
  • [26] Factors affecting the fashion purchase decision-making of single Koreans
    Jiyong Lee
    Jinsook Hwang
    Fashion and Textiles, 6
  • [27] Using critical decision method to explore factors affecting expert decision-making
    Chapman, T
    Mills, V
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 55 : 37 - 37
  • [28] Rationalisation of decision-making processes in design teams with a new formalism of design rationale
    Lewkowicz M.
    Zacklad M.
    AI & SOCIETY, 2001, 15 (4) : 396 - 408
  • [29] The Effects of Teams, Individual Players and Spectators on Basketball Officials' Decision-making Processes
    Gencay, Okkes Alpaslan
    Aydin, Ebru Eliff
    ANTHROPOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (03): : 503 - 509
  • [30] Factors affecting long-term-care residents' decision-making processes as they formulate advance directives
    Lambert, HC
    McColl, MA
    Gilbert, J
    Wong, JH
    Murray, G
    Shortt, SED
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 (05): : 626 - 633