HIV drug resistance profile in South Africa: Findings and implications from the 2017 national HIV household survey

被引:18
|
作者
Moyo, Sizulu [1 ,2 ]
Hunt, Gillian [3 ]
Zuma, Khangelani [1 ]
Zungu, Mpumi [1 ]
Marinda, Edmore [1 ,4 ]
Mabaso, Musawenkosi [1 ]
Kana, Vibha [3 ]
Kalimashe, Monalisa [3 ]
Ledwaba, Johanna [3 ]
Naidoo, Inbarani [1 ]
Takatshana, Sinovuyo [1 ]
Matjokotja, Tebogo [1 ]
Dietrich, Cheryl [5 ]
Raizes, Elliot [6 ]
Diallo, Karidia [5 ]
Kindra, Gurpreet [5 ]
Mugore, Linnetie [5 ]
Rehle, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Human Sci Res Council, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ Cape Town, Sch Publ Hlth, Cape Town, South Africa
[3] Natl Inst Communicable Dis, Ctr HIV & STIs, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Publ Hlth, Johannesburg, South Africa
[5] Ctr Dis Control, Div Global HIV & TB, Pretoria, South Africa
[6] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Global HIV & TB, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 11期
关键词
ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; NAIVE INDIVIDUALS; MORTALITY; PROVINCE; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; ROLLOUT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0241071
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing was included in the 2017 South African national HIV household survey. We describe the prevalence of HIVDR by drug class, age, sex and antiretroviral drugs (ARV) status. Methods Dried blood were spots tested for HIV, with Viral load (VL), exposure to ARVs and HIVDR testing among those HIV positive. HIVDR testing was conducted on samples with VL >= 1000 copies/ml using Next Generation Sequencing. Weighted percentages of HIVDR are reported. Results 697/1,105 (63%) of HIV positive samples were sequenced. HIVDR was detected in samples from 200 respondents (27.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 22.8-32.6)). Among these 130 (18.9% (95% CI 14.8-23.8)), had resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) only, 63 (7.8% (95% CI 5.6-10.9)) resistance to NNRTIs and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and 3 (0.5% (95% CI 0.1-2.1)) resistance to protease inhibitors. Sixty-five (55.7% (95% CI 42.6-67.9) of ARV-positive samples had HIVDR compared to 112 (22.8% (95% CI 17.7-28.7)), in ARV-negative samples. HIVDR was found in 75.6% (95% CI 59.2-87.3), n = 27, samples from respondents who reported ARV use but tested ARV-negative, and in 15.3% (95% CI 6.3-32.8), n = 7, respondents who reported no ARV use and tested ARV-negative. There were no significant age and sex differences in HIVDR. Conclusion 27% of virally unsuppressed respondents had HIVDR, increasing to 75% among those who had discontinued ARV. Our findings support strengthening first-line ARV regimens by including drugs with a higher resistance barrier and treatment adherence strategies, and close monitoring of HIVDR.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The state of innovation in South Africa: Findings from the South African National Innovation Survey
    Moses, Cheryl
    Sithole, Moses M.
    Blankley, William
    Labadarios, Demetre
    Makelane, Hlamulo
    Nkobole, Nolitha
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2012, 108 (7-8) : 8 - 12
  • [32] Trends and factors associated with illicit drug use in South Africa: Findings from multiple national population-based household surveys, 2002-2017
    Mutai, Kennedy Kipkoech
    Stone, Jack
    Scheibe, Andrew
    Fraser, Hannah
    Johnson, Leigh F.
    Vickerman, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2024, 125
  • [33] Trends and correlates of HIV prevalence among adolescents in South Africa: evidence from the 2008, 2012 and 2017 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour surveys
    Mabaso, Musawenkosi
    Maseko, Goitseone
    Sewpaul, Ronel
    Naidoo, Inbarani
    Jooste, Sean
    Takatshana, Sinovuyo
    Reddy, Tarylee
    Zuma, Khangelani
    Zungu, Nompumelelo
    AIDS RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [34] Trends and correlates of HIV prevalence among adolescents in South Africa: evidence from the 2008, 2012 and 2017 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour surveys
    Musawenkosi Mabaso
    Goitseone Maseko
    Ronel Sewpaul
    Inbarani Naidoo
    Sean Jooste
    Sinovuyo Takatshana
    Tarylee Reddy
    Khangelani Zuma
    Nompumelelo Zungu
    AIDS Research and Therapy, 18
  • [35] Health and wellbeing of HIV-positive Australians: findings from the third national HIV futures survey
    Grierson, JW
    Pitts, MK
    Misson, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS, 2005, 16 (12) : 802 - 806
  • [36] HIV risks and recent HIV testing among transgender women in Cambodia: Findings from a national survey
    Sok, Say
    Hong, Reaksmey
    Chhoun, Pheak
    Chann, Navy
    Tuot, Sovannary
    Mun, Phalkun
    Brody, Carinne
    Yi, Siyan
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (09):
  • [37] Complex adaptive HIV/AIDS risk reduction: Plausible implications from findings in Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Burman, C. J.
    Aphane, M. A.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 106 (06): : 48 - 51
  • [38] Does marital status matter in an HIV hyperendemic country? Findings from the 2012 South African National HIV Prevalence, Incidence and Behaviour Survey
    Shisana, Olive
    Risher, Kathryn
    Celentano, David D.
    Zungu, Nompumelelo
    Rehle, Thomas
    Ngcaweni, Busani
    Evans, Meredith G. B.
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2016, 28 (02): : 234 - 241
  • [39] Determinants of knowledge of HIV status in South Africa: results from a population-based HIV survey
    Peltzer, Karl
    Matseke, Gladys
    Mzolo, Thembile
    Majaja, Mmapaseka
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 9
  • [40] Determinants of knowledge of HIV status in South Africa: results from a population-based HIV survey
    Karl Peltzer
    Gladys Matseke
    Thembile Mzolo
    Mmapaseka Majaja
    BMC Public Health, 9