Educational interventions to promote respectful maternity care: A mixed-methods systematic review

被引:20
|
作者
Dhakal, Prativa [1 ]
Creedy, Debra K. [1 ]
Gamble, Jenny [2 ,3 ]
Newnham, Elizabeth [1 ]
McInnes, Rhona [1 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Logan Campus,Univ Dr, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia
[2] Coventry Univ, Sch Nursing Midwifery & Allied Hlth, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[3] Transforming Matern Care Collaborat, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Nursing; Midwifery; Respectful maternity care; Disrespect and abuse; Mistreatment; Education intervention; Knowledge; Perceptions; DIGNITY; MIDWIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103317
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: This systematic review critiqued the impact of educational interventions for midwives, nurses, or midwifery/nursing students to enhance respectful maternity care.Background: Treating women with respect during maternity care has gained considerable global attention. Although research has focused on raising awareness about respectful care among health care professionals, the effectiveness of educational interventions remains uncertain.Methods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. This review used a convergent segregated approach, and methodology recommended by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) mixed-methods systematic reviews, to synthesise and integrate research findings. Multiple databases were searched. JBI critical appraisal checklists for quasi-experimental studies, cross-sectional, and qualitative studies, as well as a mixed-methods appraisal tool were used.Findings: Nine educational interventions studies met the inclusion criteria, and most were conducted in Africa. Quantitative evidence supported the effectiveness of interventions to improve knowledge/perceptions of midwives and/or nurses regarding respectful maternity care, and woman-provider communication, and reduce women's experience of disrespect and abuse. However, variation in content, intervention delivery mode, duration, timing of pre and post-test, evaluation methods, and difficulty distilling findings from multi-pronged interventions hindered robust conclusions. Only one study used a valid and reliable tool to measure women's experience of respectful care. Qualitative findings suggest continuous education rather than one-off interventions and inclusion of other health care providers as well as managerial staff working in maternity care would help promote respectful care. Conclusion: There is low level evidence that educational interventions can improve midwives', nurses', and students' knowledge and attitudes towards RMC. Outcomes of education and training need to be monitored regularly with valid and reliable tools. There is a need for respectful maternity care education interventions in high as well as middle and low-income countries.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Male Partners' Involvement in Abortion Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review
    Altshuler, Anna L.
    Nguyen, Brian T.
    Riley, Halley E. M.
    Tinsley, Marilyn L.
    Tuncalp, Ozge
    PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 48 (04) : 209 - 219
  • [42] Community professionals' management of client care: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Kolehmainen, Niina
    Francis, Jill
    Duncan, Edward
    Fraser, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2010, 15 (01) : 47 - 55
  • [43] Individualized funding interventions to improve health and social care outcomes for people with a disability: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Fleming, Padraic
    McGilloway, Sinead
    Hernon, Marian
    Furlong, Mairead
    O'Doherty, Siobhain
    Keogh, Fiona
    Stainton, Tim
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 15 (1-2)
  • [44] Implementing post diagnostic dementia care in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Frost, Rachael
    Rait, Greta
    Aw, Su
    Brunskill, Greta
    Wilcock, Jane
    Robinson, Louise
    Knapp, Martin
    Hogan, Nicole
    Harrison Dening, Karen
    Allan, Louise
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Walters, Kate
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 25 (08) : 1381 - 1394
  • [45] Asynchronous digital health interventions for reviewing asthma: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol
    Uzzaman, Md Nazim
    Hammersley, Vicky
    McClatchey, Kirstie
    Sheringham, Jessica
    Habib, G. M. Monsur
    Pinnock, Hilary
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):
  • [46] The benefits of perioperative music interventions for patients undergoing neurosurgery: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Kwong, Koy Chong Ng Kee
    Kang, Chun Xien
    Kaliaperumal, Chandrasekaran
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 36 (04) : 472 - 482
  • [47] A mixed-methods systematic review of interventions to improve leadership competencies of managers supervising nurses
    Chen, Wenjun
    Modanloo, Shokoufeh
    Graham, Ian D.
    Hu, Jiale
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Gifford, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (08) : 4156 - 4211
  • [48] Inoperable malignant bowel obstruction: palliative interventions outcomes - mixed-methods systematic review
    Patterson, Michael
    Greenley, Sarah
    Ma, Yangmyung
    Bullock, Alex
    Curry, Jordan
    Smithson, Jacquelyn
    Lind, Michael
    Johnson, Miriam J.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (E3) : e515 - e527
  • [49] Asynchronous digital health interventions (aDHI) for reviewing asthma: a mixed-methods systematic review
    Uzzaman, Nazim
    Hammersley, Vicky
    Mcclatchey, Kirstie
    Sheringham, Jessica
    Habib, Monsur
    Pinnock, Hilary
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [50] Interventions for adults with a history of complex traumatic events: the INCiTE mixed-methods systematic review
    Melton, Hollie
    Meader, Nick
    Dale, Holly
    Wright, Kath
    Jones-Diette, Julie
    Temple, Melanie
    Shah, Iram
    Lovell, Karina
    McMillan, Dean
    Churchill, Rachel
    Barbui, Corrado
    Gilbody, Simon
    Coventry, Peter
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2020, 24 (43) : 1 - +