The integrity of the 2016 US Presidential Election: Exploring the possible impact of ideology on experts' judgments

被引：1
|
作者：
Curini, Luigi [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Milan, Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
来源：
PARTY POLITICS | 2021年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词：
expert surveys; electoral integrity; ideological heterogeneity; US 2016 Presidential Election;
D O I：
10.1177/1354068818809524
中图分类号：
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号：
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要：
Using new comparative expert data about the 2016 US Presidential Election, this article explores the effects of experts' ideological preferences on their evaluations of electoral integrity. Without contesting the claim that the 2016 election faced challenges of integrity, our analyses reveal a substantial association between negative evaluation of election integrity and experts' ideological orientation. Our results also suggest that this ideological effect is stronger in States that 'swung' from Democratic to Republican in the 2016 election.
引用
收藏
页码：81 / 91
页数：11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Information in stock prices: the case of the 2016 US presidential election
    Blau, Benjamin M.
    Griffith, Todd G.
    Whitby, Ryan J.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 51 (40) : 4385 - 4396
  • [22] An Analysis of Sentiments on Facebook during the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Alashri, Saud
    Kandala, Srinivasa Srivatsav
    Bajaj, Vikash
    Ravi, Roopek
    Smith, Kendra L.
    Desouza, Kevin C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING ASONAM 2016, 2016, : 795 - 802
  • [23] Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    An, Ruopeng
    Ji, Mengmeng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2018, 42 (05): : 21 - 31
  • [24] A Postmortem of Suspended Twitter Accounts in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Le, Huyen
    Boynton, G. R.
    Shafiq, Zubair
    Srinivasan, Padmini
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM 2019), 2019, : 258 - 265
  • [25] The 2016 US presidential election, opinion polls and the stock market
    Upadhyaya, Kamal
    Nag, Raja
    Ejara, Demissew
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMIC POLICY, 2024, 16 (02) : 194 - 204
  • [26] A Spatial Exploration of the Halo Effect in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Miller, Jennifer A.
    Grubesic, Tony H.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS, 2021, 111 (04) : 1094 - 1109
  • [27] Learning From the 2016 US General Election Presidential Debates
    Winneg, Kenneth
    Jamieson, Kathleen Hall
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2017, 61 (04) : 362 - 378
  • [28] Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 US presidential election
    Chang, Keng-Chi
    Chiang, Chun-Fang
    Lin, Ming-Jen
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (12):
  • [29] Contraceptive decision making after the 2016 US presidential election
    Judge, Colleen P.
    Borrero, Sonya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 89 - 90
  • [30] A note on internet use and the 2016 US presidential election outcome
    Boxell, Levi
    Gentzkow, Matthew
    Shapiro, Jesse M.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
12345