Recognition versus Disclosure and Audit Fees and Costs: Evidence from Pension Accounting in Japan

被引:2
|
作者
Kusano, Masaki [1 ]
Sakuma, Yoshihiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Econ, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Tohoku Gakuin Univ, Fac Business Adm, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
recognition versus disclosure; pension accounting; audit fees; audit costs; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT EVIDENCE; BUSINESS RISK; VALUE-RELEVANCE; FAIR-VALUE; LITIGATION RISK; MANAGERIAL DISCRETION; OPERATING LEASES; FINANCE LEASES; MARKET; MANIPULATION;
D O I
10.2308/JIAR-19-082
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Statement No. 26, Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits, requires Japanese firms to recognize previously off-balance sheet pension liabilities on their balance sheets. We explore auditors' responses to recognized versus disclosed pension liabilities in the Japanese audit market. We use a pre-Statement No. 26 versus post-Statement No. 26 setting to analyze whether and how disclosed versus recognized pension information affects audit fees and costs. We show that disclosed pension liabilities are processed similarly to recognized previously offbalance sheet pension liabilities when audit fees are determined. However, we find that associations with audit costs differ between disclosed and recognized pension liabilities. We also find that audit costs' differential relations with disclosed and recognized pension liabilities are particularly pronounced for firms with a large pension plan deficit. Overall, our results suggest that auditors scrutinize recognized amounts more closely than disclosed financial information, thereby increasing the reliability of accounting information.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 160
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of audit committee effectiveness on audit fees and non-audit service fees: Evidence from Australia
    Ali, Muhammad Jahangir
    Singh, Rajbans Kaur Shingara
    Al-Akra, Mahmoud
    ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 31 (02) : 174 - 191
  • [22] Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality: Evidence from the Korean Audit Market
    Behrend, Matthew J.
    Khan, Sarfraz
    Ko, Young Woo
    Park, Sung-Jin
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 19 (03) : 37 - 60
  • [23] Audit Market Concentration, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Huang, Ting-Chiao
    Chang, Hsihui
    Chiou, Jeng-Ren
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (02): : 121 - 145
  • [24] Auditor Independence and Earnings Management: Evidence of Non-Audit Fees Disclosure in Australia
    Van der Zahn, J-L. W. Mitchell
    Tower, Greg
    Brown, Alistair
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT, 2009, 15 (01): : 93 - 113
  • [25] Annual report inquiry letters, disclosure of key audit matters and audit fees: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Gou, Hongyao
    Wang, Miao
    OECONOMIA COPERNICANA, 2023, 14 (04) : 1303 - 1339
  • [26] Audit Partner Specialization and Audit Fees: Some Evidence from Sweden
    Zerni, Mikko
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 29 (01) : 312 - +
  • [27] The impact of audit committee characteristics on audit fees; evidence from Ghana
    Afenya, Millicent Selase
    Arthur, Benedict
    Kwarteng, Williams
    Opoku, Pious
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [28] Gender diversity in audit committees and audit fees: evidence from China
    Alkebsee, Radwan Hussien
    Tian, Gao-Liang
    Usman, Muhammad
    Siddique, Muhammad Abubakkar
    Alhebry, Adeeb A.
    MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2021, 36 (01) : 72 - 104
  • [29] The impact of key audit matters on audit fees: evidence from Syria
    Aljerd, Rasha Basheer
    Abazeed, Douaa Ghasan
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2025,
  • [30] Audit fees and audit adjustments: evidence from Welsh local authorities
    Baylis, Richard M.
    Greenwood, Margaret J.
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2016, 36 (05) : 357 - 364