A simulation based multi-attribute group decision making technique with decision constraints

被引:16
|
作者
Bayram, Husamettin [1 ]
Sahin, Ramazan [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06570 Maltepe, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Multi-attribute group decision making; TOPSIS; Triangular distribution; Absolute judgments; Monte Carlo simulation; Decision constraints; FUZZY TOPSIS METHOD; SYSTEM SELECTION; SUPPLIER SELECTION; PROJECT SELECTION; ROBOT SELECTION; AHP; METHODOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; MANAGEMENT; CHAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.049
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is a useful technique for solving Multi Attribute Group Decision Making (MAGDM) problems. In MAGDM, the performance scores of the alternatives and the weights of assessment attributes are mostly vague. Therefore, using of deterministic data throughout decision making process may lead to inaccurate results. In order to overcome inherent vagueness and uncertainty, various fuzzy MAGDM techniques were presented in the literature. However, these fuzzy MAGDM techniques are focused on expected and extreme values, which are sometimes insufficient for the precise determination of alternatives preference structure. In this paper, in order to eliminate the limitations of deterministic and fuzzy MAGDM methods, we present a probabilistic methodology, which is based on TOPSIS and Monte-Carlo simulation of triangular data. In addition to its straightforward application and thanks to its versatility, simulation enables decision makers to incorporate some decision constraints into decision-making process. Two illustrative examples are also given to show the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. The method is also compared with a fuzzy TOPSIS technique from the literature. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 640
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Group Decision Making in Evaluation and Ranking of Students by Extended Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique
    Borissova, Daniela
    Keremedchiev, Delyan
    CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 19 (03) : 45 - 56
  • [32] A new method with projection technique for fuzzy multi-attribute decision making
    Lan, JB
    Xu, Y
    Liu, JZ
    APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2004, : 282 - 287
  • [33] An interactive procedure for multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete information
    Kim, SH
    Han, CH
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1999, 26 (08) : 755 - 772
  • [34] A generalized multi-attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy set
    Tao, Zhifu
    Chen, Huayou
    Zou, Weiyuan
    Zhou, Ligang
    Liu, Jinpei
    Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2013, 212 : 63 - 71
  • [35] An interactive procedure for multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete information
    Graduate School of Management, Korea Adv. Inst. Sci. and Technology, 207-43 Cheongtyangri, Dongdaemoon, Seoul 130-012, Korea, Republic of
    Comp. Oper. Res., 8 (755-772):
  • [36] Evidential model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making
    Qiang Fu
    Yafei Song
    Cheng-li Fan
    Lei Lei
    Xiaodan Wang
    Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 7615 - 7635
  • [37] The Mixed Multi-attribute Group Decision Making Method with Preference Information
    Bian Xiaofei
    Pan Haiwei
    12TH CHINESE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CHINESECSCW 2017), 2017, : 241 - 242
  • [38] Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics
    Li, Yupeng
    Liu, Meng
    Cao, Jin
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Na
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 184
  • [39] Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics
    Li, Yupeng
    Liu, Meng
    Cao, Jin
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Na
    Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 184
  • [40] A quantum framework for modelling subjectivity in multi-attribute group decision making
    He, Zichang
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    Jiang, Wen
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 124 : 560 - 572