Adverse prognostic impact of capsular incision at radical prostatectomy for Japanese men with clinically localized prostate cancer

被引:14
|
作者
Kumano, Masafumi [1 ]
Miyake, Hideaki [1 ]
Muramaki, Mototsugu [1 ]
Kurahashi, Toshifumi [1 ]
Takenaka, Atsushi [1 ]
Fujisawa, Masato [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Urol, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
关键词
Capsular incision; Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; SPECIMENS; CARCINOMA; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-008-9467-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the significance of capsular incision (CI) at radical prostatectomy (RP) for men with prostate cancer. This study included 267 men who underwent RP without neoadjuvant therapy and were pathologically diagnosed as having organ-confined disease. CI was defined as exposing benign or malignant glands at the inked margin without documented extraprostatic extension. Pathological examinations identified CI in 53 RP specimens (19.9%), while CI was not detected in the remaining 214 specimens (80.1%). The locations of CIs in RP specimens from these 53 patients were as follows: 39 (73.6%) at the apex, 11 (20.0%) at the anterior site, 4 (7.5%) at the posterior site and 12 (22.6%) at the bladder neck. The incidence of CI was significantly affected by surgical procedure, preoperative serum PSA and microvenous invasion in RP specimen. During the observation period of this study, biochemical recurrence occurred in 10 (18.9%) of the 53 with CI and 20 (9.3%) of the 214 without CI, and the biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with CI was significantly poorer than those without CI. Furthermore, of several factors examined, biochemical recurrence was significantly associated with preoperative serum PSA, Gleason score, perineural invasion and capsular incision, among which only preoperative serum PSA appeared to be an independent predictor of biochemical recurrence. Despite the lack of independent significance, the presence of CI has an adverse impact on biochemical outcome in patients undergoing RP for clinically localized prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Microvascular invasion in prostate cancer:: Prognostic significance in patients treated by radical prostatectomy for clinically localized carcinoma
    van den Ouden, D
    Kranse, R
    Hop, WCJ
    van der Kwast, TH
    Schröder, FH
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 1998, 60 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [22] Health-related quality of life after radical prostatectomy in Japanese men with localized prostate cancer
    Namiki, S
    Tochigi, T
    Kuwahara, M
    Ohnuma, T
    Ioritani, N
    Soma, F
    Shintaku, I
    Terai, A
    Nakagawa, H
    Satoh, M
    Saito, S
    Koinuma, N
    Arai, Y
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 10 (12) : 643 - 650
  • [23] Safety and feasibility of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer in elderly Japanese patients
    Nishikawa, Masatomo
    Watanabe, Hiromitsu
    Kurahashi, Tomofumi
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 5 (01) : 13 - 16
  • [24] Importance of Baseline Potency Rate Assessment of Men Diagnosed with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Prior to Radical Prostatectomy
    Salomon, Georg
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Budaeus, Lars
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Briganti, Alberto
    Steuber, Thomas
    Heinzer, Hans
    Haese, Alexander
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Huland, Hartwig
    Chun, Felix
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2009, 6 (02): : 498 - 504
  • [25] Serum acid phosphatase level and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Han, M
    Piantadosi, S
    Zahurak, ML
    Sokoll, LJ
    Chan, DW
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    Partin, AW
    UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (04) : 707 - 711
  • [26] Tumor Focality Does Not Predict Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Masterson, Timothy A.
    Cheng, Liang
    Mehan, Rahul M.
    Koch, Michael O.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02): : 506 - 510
  • [27] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED, HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER: IMPACT OF THE DEFINITION AND SURGICAL APPROACH ON OUTCOME
    Touijer, K.
    Katz, D.
    Savage, C.
    Reuter, V.
    Eastham, J. A.
    Scardino, P. T.
    Guillonneau, B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (02) : 222 - 222
  • [28] The Length of a Positive Surgical Margin Is of Prognostic Significance in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy
    Servoll, Einar
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Saeter, Thorstein
    Nesland, Jahn M.
    Axcrona, Ulrika
    Waaler, Gudmund
    Axcrona, Karol
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (03) : 289 - 295
  • [29] Perineural invasion as a predictor of biochemical outcome following radical prostatectomy for select men with clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Wu, YH
    Chen, MH
    Nash, M
    Renshaw, AA
    Richie, JP
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (01): : 126 - 129
  • [30] Importance of baseline potency rate assessment of men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy
    Salomon, Georg
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Eichelberg, Christian
    Steuber, Thomas P.
    Heinzer, Hans
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 207 - 207