Organizational Adaptation in Multi-Stakeholder Crisis Response: An Experimental Study

被引:21
|
作者
Pramanik, Roshni [1 ]
Ekman, Olof [1 ]
Hassel, Henrik [1 ]
Tehler, Henrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Fac Engn, LUCRAM, Div Risk & Societal Safety,CSR, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
GROUP NORMS; EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT; SELF-CATEGORIZATION; DECISION-MAKING; SOCIAL IDENTITY; TRUST; COMMUNICATION; COORDINATION; COOPERATION; FAMILIARITY;
D O I
10.1111/1468-5973.12094
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Modern day crises demand organizations to collaborate and adapt to new roles, functions and structures. In such situations, lack of collaborative behaviour and openness between organizations can result in reduced adaptive ability. Therefore, it is important to facilitate collaboration between organizations. We have studied the extent to which crisis managers are prepared to work with personnel and resources from organizations other than their own when responding to crises. An experiment was designed with four different organizations in Sweden, which involved decision making concerning whether the participants systematically favoured their own organization over others. Findings indicate that increasing familiarity and expectation of future cooperation with other organizations increased the likelihood that decision makers would be prepared to work with other organizations in joint crisis management.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 245
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The role of transparency in multi-stakeholder educational recommendations
    Yong Zheng
    Juan Ruiz Toribio
    User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 2021, 31 : 513 - 540
  • [42] Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
    Mena, Sebastien
    Palazzo, Guido
    BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2012, 22 (03) : 527 - 556
  • [43] Engaging patients on tumor boards: A multi-stakeholder perspective study.
    Smith, Kelly M.
    Hill, Mary A.
    Rosendall, Kelly
    Farha, Maen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [44] Confidence in Models and Simulations: A Multi-Stakeholder Analysis
    Chaudhari, Ashish M.
    Rebentisch, Eric
    Rhodes, Donna H.
    TRANSDISCIPLINARITY AND THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING, 2022, 28 : 103 - 112
  • [45] An Accountability Approach to Resolve Multi-stakeholder Conflicts
    Yanagisawa, Yukiko
    Yokote, Yasuhiko
    COMPUTER SAFETY, RELIABILITY, AND SECURITY (SAFECOMP 2021), 2021, 12853 : 175 - 186
  • [46] Elements of success in multi-stakeholder deliberation platforms
    Garard J.
    Koch L.
    Kowarsch M.
    Palgrave Communications, 4 (1)
  • [47] Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management
    Lankford, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (02) : 321 - 322
  • [48] Tensions in talent identification: a multi-stakeholder perspective
    McDonnell, Anthony
    Skuza, Agnieszka
    Jooss, Stefan
    Scullion, Hugh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 34 (06): : 1132 - 1156
  • [49] Explainable Multi-Stakeholder Job Recommender Systems
    Schellingerhout, Roan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTEENTH ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS, RECSYS 2024, 2024, : 1318 - 1322
  • [50] Multi-stakeholder negotiation as a resource management tool
    Malkin, K
    MAKING PROTECTION WORK: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PARKS AND ON PUBLIC LANDS, 1997, : 474 - 477