Ambulation after femoral sheath removal in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective comparison of early vs. late ambulation

被引:12
|
作者
Schiks, Ingrid E. J. M. [2 ]
Schoonhoven, Lisette [1 ]
Aengevaeren, Wim R. M. [2 ]
Nogarede-Hoekstra, Coby [1 ]
van Achterberg, Theo
Verheugt, Freek W. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care Res, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Heart Lung Ctr, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
clinical trial; comfort; coronary heart disease; evidence-based practice; hospital care; nursing care; LOW-DOSE HEPARIN; VASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; HEMOSTASIS TECHNIQUES; GUIDING CATHETERS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ANGIOPLASTY; ANGIOGRAPHY; REGISTRY; COMFORT; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02587.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
To investigate if ambulation four hours after sheath removal can replace ambulation 10 hours or more after sheath removal with regard to puncture site complications after percutaneous coronary interventions and to examine patient comfort in both groups. Early ambulation after percutaneous coronary intervention may facilitate earlier hospital discharge. Whether this approach is safe, is unknown. A non-randomised comparative study. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed by femoral approach. Registered nurses of the ward removed the sheath and haemostasis was achieved by manual compression. After bed rest with a compression bandage for four hours, the patients in the early ambulation group were ambulated. The patients in the control group stayed in bed till the next morning. Primary study endpoint was the composition of puncture site complications: haematoma, bleeding, false aneurysm and arteriovenous fistula. Secondary endpoints were occurrence of vasovagal collapse after mobilisation, back pain and problems with voiding. In the early ambulation group (n = 329) the total number of complications was nine (2.7%), vs. six (3.0%) in the control group (n = 202). The complication rate in the early ambulation group is not increased compared to the control group (test for non-inferiority p = 0.002). Hence non-inferiority is accepted and practical equivalence shown. There were no statistically significant differences concerning patient comfort between the groups. Early ambulation four hours after femoral sheath removal is feasible and safe. The incidence of puncture site complications in the early ambulation group is not increased in comparison with the group with prolonged bed rest. Patients could possibly be discharged earlier after percutaneous coronary intervention, allowing percutaneous coronary intervention in an ambulant setting. Further research should confirm these findings and extend the research to the effect of various closure devices in early ambulation and on patients' well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:1862 / 1870
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Femoral neck fracture associated with early ambulation after transfemoral arterial intervention and use of a vascular closure device
    Daliri, Armand
    Kalinowski, Marc
    Volkmann, Ruediger
    Thon, Peter
    Froelich, Jens J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 31 (04) : 833 - 834
  • [22] Early sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention using Assiut Femoral Compression Device is feasible and safe. Results of a randomized controlled trial
    Hassan, Ayman K. M.
    Hasan-Ali, Hosam
    Demetry, Salwa R.
    Refaat, Randa
    Ali, Ahmed S.
    EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 67 (01): : 69 - 77
  • [23] A Comparison of Head Elevation Protocols After Coronary Angiography Femoral Sheath Removal
    Olson, Nancy C.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2013, 28 (04) : 307 - 308
  • [24] Is immediate ambulation after percutaneous coronary intervention associated with increased vascular complications at the puncture site? a randomized pilot study
    Jensen, A. B.
    Ramlau-Hansen, C. H.
    Lassen, J. F.
    Christensen, C. F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2012, 11 : S63 - S63
  • [25] Feasibility of early ambulation after percutaneous coronary interventions using 5 French catheters and low dose anticoagulation
    Battaglia, S
    Danchin, N
    Salemme, L
    Popusoy, G
    Moscato, F
    Rubino, P
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 : 94 - 94
  • [26] Vaso-vagal reactions during femoral arterial sheath removal after percutaneous coronary intervention and impact on cardiac events
    Juergens, Craig P.
    Lo, Sidney
    French, John K.
    Leung, Dominic Y. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 127 (02) : 252 - 254
  • [27] Comparison of femoral bleeding complications after coronary anglography versus percutaneous coronary intervention
    Berry, C
    Kelly, J
    Cobbe, SM
    Eteiba, H
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 94 (03): : 361 - 363
  • [28] The Angio-Seal™ Arterial Closure Device for Early Ambulation after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Receiving Low-dose Enoxaparin
    Lai, Y-C
    Kao, H-L
    Lin, Y-H
    Lin, M-S
    Ho, Y-L
    Chao, C-L
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (05) : 1077 - 1084
  • [29] Early vs. Late Readmission following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Predictors and Impact on Long-Term Outcomes
    Eccleston, David
    Duong, My-Ngan
    Chowdhury, Enayet
    Schwarz, Nisha
    Reid, Christopher
    Liew, Danny
    Conradie, Andre
    Worthley, Stephen G. G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [30] Left Radial Versus Femoral Approach in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Prospective Comparison
    Bernat, Ivo
    Koza, Jiri
    Pesek, Jan
    Tesarova, Jitka
    Rokyta, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (10) : A24 - A24