Intracranial Calcifications and Hemorrhages: Characterization with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

被引:206
|
作者
Chen, Weiwei [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Wenzhen [1 ]
Kovanlikaya, IIhami [2 ]
Kovanlikaya, Arzu [2 ]
Liu, Tian [2 ]
Wang, Shuai [2 ,5 ]
Salustri, Carlo [2 ,6 ]
Wang, Yi [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Radiol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Ithaca, NY USA
[4] Kyung Hee Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Elect Engn, Chengdu 610054, Peoples R China
[6] Fatebenefratelli Hosp, Inst Cognit Sci & Technol, Rome, Italy
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ENABLED DIPOLE INVERSION; MAGNETIC-FIELD; PHASE; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; IMAGE; MAP; RECONSTRUCTION; LESIONS; COSMOS;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.13122640
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To compare gradient-echo (GRE) phase magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in the detection of intracranial calcifications and hemorrhages. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. Thirty-eight patients (24 male, 14 female; mean age, 33 years +/- 16 [standard deviation]) with intracranial calcifications and/ or hemorrhages diagnosed on the basis of computed tomography (CT), MR imaging (interval between examinations, 1.78 days +/- 1.31), and clinical information were selected. GRE and QSM images were reconstructed from the same GRE data. Two experienced neuroradiologists independently identified the calcifications and hemorrhages on the QSM and GRE phase images in two randomized sessions. Sensitivity, specificity, and interobserver agreement were computed and compared with the McNemar test and kappa coefficients. Calcification loads and volumes were measured to gauge intermodality correlations with CT. A total of 156 lesions were detected: 62 hemorrhages, 89 calcifications, and five mixed lesions containing both hemorrhage and calcification. Most of these lesions (146 of 151 lesions, 96.7%) had a dominant sign on QSM images suggestive of a specific diagnosis of hemorrhage or calcium, whereas half of these lesions (76 of 151, 50.3%) were heterogeneous on GRE phase images and thus were difficult to characterize. Averaged over the two independent observers for detecting hemorrhages, QSM achieved a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 94.5%, which were significantly higher than those at GRE phase imaging (71% and 80%, respectively; P < .05 for both readers). In the identification of calcifications, QSM achieved a sensitivity of 80.5%, which was marginally higher than that with GRE phase imaging (71%; P = .08 and .10 for the two readers), and a specificity of 93.5%, which was significantly higher than that with GRE phase imaging (76.5%; P < .05 for both readers). QSM achieved significantly better interobserver agreements than GRE phase imaging in the differentiation of hemorrhage from calcification (kappa: 0.91 vs 0.55, respectively; P < .05). QSM is superior to GRE phase imaging in the differentiation of intracranial calcifications from hemorrhages and with regard to the sensitivity and specificity of detecting hemorrhages and the specificity of detecting calcifications.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 505
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inverse Problem in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
    Choi, Jae Kyu
    Park, Hyoung Suk
    Wang, Shuai
    Wang, Yi
    Seo, Jin Keun
    SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES, 2014, 7 (03): : 1669 - 1689
  • [42] Thin slab quantitative susceptibility mapping
    Naji, Nashwan
    Wilman, Alan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 90 (06) : 2290 - 2305
  • [43] Usefulness of quantitative susceptibility mapping in ALS
    Warner, Robin
    NEUROLOGY, 2022, 98 (18)
  • [44] Functional quantitative susceptibility mapping (fQSM)
    Balla, David Z.
    Sanchez-Panchuelo, Rosa M.
    Wharton, Samuel J.
    Hagberg, Gisela E.
    Scheffler, Klaus
    Francis, Susan T.
    Bowtell, Richard
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 100 : 112 - 124
  • [45] Editorial: Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Neurodegeneration
    Yan, Fuhua
    He, Naying
    Haacke, E. Mark
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [46] Quantitative susceptibility mapping in atypical Parkinsonisms
    Mazzucchi, Sonia
    Frosini, Daniela
    Costagli, Mauro
    Del Prete, Eleonora
    Donatelli, Graziella
    Cecchi, Paolo
    Migaleddu, Gianmichele
    Bonuccelli, Ubaldo
    Ceravolo, Roberto
    Cosottini, Mirco
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2019, 24
  • [47] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping in Multiple Sclerosis
    Langkammer, Christian
    Liu, Tian
    Khalil, Michael
    Enzinger, Christian
    Jehna, Margit
    Fuchs, Siegrid
    Fazekas, Franz
    Wang, Yi
    Ropele, Stefan
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (02) : 551 - 559
  • [48] Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Concepts and Applications
    J. R. Reichenbach
    F. Schweser
    B. Serres
    A. Deistung
    Clinical Neuroradiology, 2015, 25 : 225 - 230
  • [49] Image Reconstruction in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
    Natterer, Frank
    SIAM JOURNAL ON IMAGING SCIENCES, 2016, 9 (03): : 1127 - 1131
  • [50] Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis
    Langkammer, C.
    Liu, T.
    Khalil, M.
    Enzinger, C.
    Jehna, M.
    Fuchs, S.
    Fazekas, F.
    Wang, Y.
    Ropele, S.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2012, 18 : 393 - 393