Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy

被引:23
|
作者
Hatiboglu, G. [1 ]
Teber, D. [1 ]
Tichy, D. [2 ]
Pahernik, S. [1 ]
Hadaschik, B. [1 ]
Nyarangi-Dix, J. [1 ]
Hohenfellner, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg Hosp, Dept Urol, Neuenheimer Feld 110, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] DKFZ Heidelberg, Dept Biostat, Neuenheimer Feld 581, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Prostatectomy; Immediate continence; Prognostic factors; URINARY CONTINENCE; EARLY RECOVERY; CANCER; INCONTINENCE; RADIATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-015-1594-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To identify predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy. Patients and methods A total of 1553 patients underwent radical prostatectomy in a single institution (670 RRP, 883 RARP), had complete perioperative data and follow-up for urinary continence and were included in this prospective analysis. Immediate continence was defined as no pad usage after catheter removal. Evaluated parameters included age, body mass index, ECOG performance status, erectile function, prostate volume, PSA, Gleason score, tumor stage and D'Amico risk groups, as well as surgical approach (RRP, RARP), surgeon volume, nerve-sparing, lymphadenectomy, blood transfusions and duration of catheterization. Results A total of 240 men (15.5 %) did not require any pads 1 day or later after removal of the transurethral catheter. Correlation of parameters with immediate continence revealed significance for age (p < 0.001), ECOG-score (p = 0.025), erectile function (p = 0.001), nerve-sparing (p = 0.022), Gleason score (p = 0.002) and surgeon volume (p = 0.022). Multivariate analyses identified IIEF-score >21 (p = 0.031), ECOG (p < 0.05), bilateral nerve-sparing (p = 0.049), Gleason score <3 + 4 (p = 0.028), less blood transfusion (p = 0.044) and surgeon volume (p <= 0.042) as the remaining prognostic parameters for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy. The type of surgical approach (robotic vs. open radical prostatectomy) did not yield significant influence. Conclusion Evaluating continence in a contemporary prospective cohort revealed 15.5 % of patients never requiring a pad postoperatively. Predictive parameters for immediate continence were erectile function, ECOG, bilateral nerve-sparing, less blood transfusion and Gleason score. Furthermore, the surgeon's experience but not his operative technique had a significant impact on immediate postoperative continence.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 120
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RACIAL DISPARITIES IN CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Hu, Jim
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Sjoberg, Daniel
    Tzeng, Michael
    Yu, Miko
    Vickers, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1028 - E1029
  • [22] How to preserve continence after radical prostatectomy
    Ravery, V
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2005, 4 (04) : 8 - 11
  • [23] THE UNPREDICTABILITY OF SOCIAL CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Singh, Karandeep
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Seyedsalehi, Sajjad
    Solomon, M. Hugh
    Auffenberg, Gregory
    Stockton, Benjamin
    Miller, David C.
    Denton, Brian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E202 - E202
  • [24] Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy
    Capogrosso, Paolo
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Salonia, Andrea
    Cathala, Nathalie
    Mombet, Annick
    Sivaraman, Arjun
    Barret, Eric
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2016, 16 (10) : 1039 - 1052
  • [25] REDUCING THE TIME TO CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Kumar, Pardeep
    Knight, Olivia
    Lindisfarne, Ed
    Cahill, Declan
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (04) : 525 - 526
  • [26] Preoperative predictive model of early urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Fan Zhang
    Hongling Chu
    Yichang Hao
    Bin Yang
    Ye Yan
    Yu Zhang
    Cheng Liu
    Lulin Ma
    Yi Huang
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 59 - 65
  • [27] Preoperative predictive model of early urinary continence recovery after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Zhang, Fan
    Chu, Hongling
    Hao, Yichang
    Yang, Bin
    Yan, Ye
    Zhang, Yu
    Liu, Cheng
    Ma, Lulin
    Huang, Yi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 41 (1) : 59 - 65
  • [28] Continence after introducing NeuroSAFE in radical prostatectomy
    van der Slot, M. A.
    Remmers, S.
    Van Leenders, G. J. L. H.
    Muijlaert, D.
    Busstra, M. B.
    Gan, M.
    Klaver, O. S.
    Rietbergen, J. B. W.
    Den Bakker, M. A.
    Kweldam, C. F.
    Bangma, C. H.
    Roobol, M. J.
    Venderbos, L. D. F.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S1678 - S1679
  • [29] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF NOMOGRAMS TO PREDICT THE RECOVERY OF URINARY CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: COMPARISONS BETWEEN IMMEDIATE, EARLY, AND LATE CONTINENCE
    Jeong, Seong Jin
    Lee, Sang Eun
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2013, 32 (02) : 148 - 148
  • [30] Predictors of Immediate Continence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Sharma, Pranav
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Ghani, Khurshid R.
    Sukumar, Shyam
    Menon, Mani
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (04) : 442 - 446