Bayesian modeling and forecasting of Value-at-Risk via threshold realized volatility

被引:12
|
作者
Chen, Cathy W. S. [1 ]
Watanabe, Toshiaki [2 ]
机构
[1] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Stat, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
[2] Hitotsubashi Univ, Inst Econ Res, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo methods; asymmetric realized GARCH model; out-of-sample forecasts; threshold; volatility forecasting; STOCHASTIC VOLATILITY; QUANTILE FORECASTS; RETURNS; SAMPLER; POST;
D O I
10.1002/asmb.2395
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study proposes a threshold realized generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedastic (GARCH) model that jointly models daily returns and realized volatility, thereby taking into account the bias and asymmetry of realized volatility. We incorporate this threshold realized GARCH model with skew Student-t innovations as the observation equation, view this model as a sharp transition model, and treat the realized volatility as a proxy for volatility under this nonlinear structure. Through the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo method, the model can jointly estimate the parameters in the return equation, the volatility equation, and the measurement equation. As an illustration, we conduct a simulation study and apply the proposed method to the US and Japan stock markets. Based on quantile forecasting and volatility estimation, we find that the threshold heteroskedastic framework with realized volatility successfully models the asymmetric dynamic structure. We also investigate the predictive ability of volatility by comparing the proposed model with the traditional GARCH model as well as some popular asymmetric GARCH and realized GARCH models. This threshold realized GARCH model with skew Student-t innovations outperforms the competing risk models in out-of-sample volatility and Value-at-Risk forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 765
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Heterogeneous Volatility Information Content for the Realized GARCH Modeling and Forecasting Volatility
    Xu, Wen
    Aschakulporn, Pakorn
    Zhang, Jin E.
    STUDIES IN NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND ECONOMETRICS, 2024,
  • [22] Evaluation of volatility models for forecasting Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall in the Portuguese stock market
    Sobreira, Nuno
    Louro, Rui
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 32
  • [23] Modelling the volatility transmission and conditional correlations between A and B shares in forecasting value-at-risk
    da Veiga, Bernardo
    Chan, Felix
    McAleer, Michael
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2008, 78 (2-3) : 155 - 171
  • [24] Bayesian forecasting of Value-at-Risk based on variant smooth transition heteroskedastic models
    Chen, Cathy W. S.
    Weng, Monica M. C.
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2017, 10 (03) : 451 - 470
  • [25] Bayesian Time-Varying Quantile Forecasting for Value-at-Risk in Financial Markets
    Gerlach, Richard H.
    Chen, Cathy W. S.
    Chan, Nancy Y. C.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2011, 29 (04) : 481 - 492
  • [26] Heavy-tailed mixture GARCH volatility modeling and Value-at-Risk estimation
    Nikolaev, Nikolay Y.
    Boshnakov, Georgi N.
    Zimmer, Robert
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (06) : 2233 - 2243
  • [27] Tail risk forecasting of realized volatility CAViaR models
    Chen, Cathy W. S.
    Hsu, Hsiao-Yun
    Watanabe, Toshiaki
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 51
  • [28] Value-at-risk forecasting via dynamic asymmetric exponential power distributions
    Ou, Lu
    Zhao, Zhibiao
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2021, 40 (02) : 291 - 300
  • [29] Risk management of risk under the Basel Accord: A Bayesian approach to forecasting Value-at-Risk of VIX futures
    Casarin, Roberto
    Chang, Chia-Lin
    Jimenez-Martin, Juan-Angel
    McAleer, Michael
    Perez-Amaral, Teodosio
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2013, 94 : 183 - 204
  • [30] Forecasting crude oil price volatility and value-at-risk: Evidence from historical and recent data
    Lux, Thomas
    Segnon, Mawuli
    Gupta, Rangan
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 56 : 117 - 133