Improving energy benchmarking with self-reported data

被引:24
|
作者
Hsu, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept City & Reg Planning, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION | 2014年 / 42卷 / 05期
关键词
benchmarking; building stock; buildings; data quality; disclosure; energy performance; evidence base; Energy Star; policy implementation; DATA QUALITY; EFFICIENCY; BUILDINGS; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1080/09613218.2014.887612
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy benchmarking for buildings has become increasingly important in government policy and industry practice for energy efficiency. The questions of how energy benchmarking is currently conducted, and how it might be improved using rapidly growing quantities of self-reported data, are examined. A case study of commercial office buildings in New York City demonstrates how the rapid growth in self-reported data presents both new opportunities and challenges for energy benchmarking for buildings. A critique is presented for the scoring methodology and data sources for Energy Star, one of the largest and most successful benchmarking certification schemes. Findings from recent studies are examined to illustrate how this certification currently works in the marketplace. Self-reported building energy data are rapidly growing in Portfolio Manager (the user interface to Energy Star) due to mandatory energy benchmarking laws, and can be used to improve Energy Star's current scoring methods. These self-reported data are tested and improved for analysis by applying theories and methods of data quality developed in computer science, statistics and data management. These new data constitute a critical building block for the development of energy efficiency policies, and will affect how government, consultants, and owners measure and compare building energy use.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 656
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deals center on self-reported patient data services
    Proffitt, Allison
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (11) : 1016 - 1016
  • [32] MAPPING PHYSICIAN NETWORKS WITH SELF-REPORTED AND ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
    Barnett, Michael Lawrence
    Landon, Bruce Evan
    Keating, Nancy Lynn
    O'Malley, Alistair James
    Christakis, Nicholas Alexander
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 : S52 - S52
  • [33] Deals center on self-reported patient data services
    Allison Proffitt
    Nature Biotechnology, 2012, 30 : 1016 - 1016
  • [34] A comparison of self-reported versus administrative race data
    Stanley, E.
    Wood, R.
    Kergosien, L.
    Krousel-Wood, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 56 (01) : 485 - 485
  • [35] SELF-REPORTED ACCIDENTS - EXAMINATION OF DATA GATHERING TECHNIQUES
    WEINSTEIN, S
    JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1974, 6 (01) : 46 - 47
  • [36] Improving Self-reported Prescription Medicine Data Quality with a Commercial Database Lookup Tool and Claims Matching
    Defever, Kali
    Reimer, Becky
    Trierweiler, Michael
    Comperchio, Elise
    FIELD METHODS, 2024, 36 (01) : 37 - 51
  • [37] COMPARISON OF SELF-REPORTED ENERGY-INTAKE WITH ENERGY-EXPENDITURE
    DEGROOT, LCPGM
    VANSTAVEREN, WA
    DEBOER, JO
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1991, 53 (06): : 1504 - 1504
  • [38] VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORTED DATA ON PREGNANCY OUTCOMES - COMPARING SELF-REPORTED DATA OF CHILDHOOD CANCER SURVIVORS WITH DATA FROM A NATIONWIDE POPULATION-BASED REGISTRY
    Overbeek, Annelies
    van den Berg, Marleen
    Hukkelhoven, Chantal
    Kaspers, Gert-Jan
    van Dulmen-den Broeder, Eline
    Lambalk, Cornelis
    van Leeuwen, Flora
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2012, 59 (06) : 974 - 974
  • [39] Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data
    Reimer, Bryan
    D'Ambrosio, Lisa A.
    Coughun, Joseph F.
    Kafrissen, Michael E.
    Biederman, Joseph
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2006, 38 (02) : 314 - 324
  • [40] Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data
    Bryan Reimer
    Lisa A. D’Ambrosio
    Joseph F. Coughlin
    Michael E. Kafrissen
    Joseph Biederman
    Behavior Research Methods, 2006, 38 : 314 - 324