Research on the Optimal Aggregation Method of Decision Maker Preference Judgment Matrix for Group Decision Making

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Li, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangnan Univ, Sch Internet Things Engn, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangnan Univ, Business Sch, Wuxi 214122, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2019年 / 7卷
关键词
Group decision making; analytic hierarchy process; judgment matrices; aggregation; plant growth simulation algorithm (PGSA); ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; OPERATORS; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923463
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The main focus of this paper is to present a new aggregation method of judgment matrices, which is based on the optimal aggregation model and the efficient aggregation algorithm. The reciprocal elements in the decision maker judgment matrices are mapped into the corresponding points on the two-dimensional coordinates. We can express the differences between different decision makers' preferences by the Euclidean distance among these points. We use the plant growth simulation algorithm (PGSA) to obtain the optimal aggregation points which can reflect the opinions of the entire decision makers group. The aggregation matrix of decision maker preference is composed of these optimal aggregation points and the consistency test has been passed. Compared with the weighted geometric mean method (WGMM) and minimum distance method (MDM), the sum of Euclidean distances from the aggregation points to other given points in this paper is minimal. The validity and rationality of this method are also verified by the analysis and comparison of examples, which provides a new idea to solve the group decision making (GDM) problems.
引用
收藏
页码:78803 / 78816
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An assignment method for group decision making with uncertain preference ordinals
    Tianhui You
    Zhiping Fan
    Zhuchao Yu
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2012, 21 : 174 - 183
  • [22] An assignment method for group decision making with uncertain preference ordinals
    You, Tianhui
    Fan, Zhiping
    Yu, Zhuchao
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2012, 21 (02) : 174 - 183
  • [23] A Method for Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision Making with Preference Information in the Form of Fuzzy Complementary Judgment Matrix
    Gong Yanbing
    Zhang Jiguo
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 3, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 336 - 340
  • [24] Preference-Approval Structures in Group Decision Making: Axiomatic Distance and Aggregation
    Dong, Yucheng
    Li, Yao
    He, Ying
    Chen, Xia
    DECISION ANALYSIS, 2021, 18 (04) : 273 - 295
  • [25] Ranking of triangular fuzzy mutual judgment matrix in group decision-making
    Ting-ting, Gu
    Zeng-yi, Zhao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, 2007, : 961 - 964
  • [26] Research on user preference acquisition method based on decision matrix
    Zhao, Huiran
    Shi, Lei
    WeijieYao
    YuexingZhong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION ENGINEERING FOR MECHANICS AND MATERIALS, 2016, 97 : 728 - 732
  • [27] Decision Rule Aggregation Approach to Support Group Decision Making
    Saad, Ines
    Chakhar, Salem
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION: A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE, GDN 2020, 2020, 388 : 163 - 176
  • [28] A kind of large Group Decision Making method on the utility value preference information of Decision member
    Xu Xuanhua
    Chen Xiaohong
    Wang Hongwei
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 11941 - 11946
  • [29] Method for large group decision making with incomplete decision preference information based on trust mechanism
    Xu X.-H.
    Wang B.
    Zhou Y.-J.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2016, 31 (04): : 577 - 585
  • [30] Optimal consensus models for group decision making under linguistic preference relations
    Xu, Yejun
    Sun, Hao
    Wang, Huimin
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (06) : 1201 - 1228