Efficiency and endogenous fertility

被引:4
|
作者
Perez-Nievas, Mikel [1 ]
Conde-Ruiz, Jose I. [2 ,3 ]
Gimenez, Eduardo L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ 1, Madrid, Spain
[3] Fdn Estudios Econ Aplicada, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Vigo, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ, Hist & Inst Econ, Vigo, Spain
关键词
Efficiency; optimal population; endogenous fertility; A-efficiency; P-efficiency; Millian efficiency; birth-order criterion; birth-date criterion; OLG MODELS; POPULATION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3982/TE2138
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the properties of the notions of A-efficiency and P-efficiency, which were proposed by Golosov et al. (2007), to evaluate allocations in a general overlapping generations setting in which fertility choices are endogenously selected from a continuum and any two agents of the same generation are identical. First, we show that the properties of A-efficient allocations vary depending on the criterion used to identify potential agents. If one identifies potential agents by their position in their siblings' birth order, as Golosov, Jones, and Ter-tilt do, then A-efficiency requires that a positive measure of agents use most of their endowment to maximize the utility of the dynasty head, which, in environments with finite-horizon altruism, implies that some agents-the youngest in every family-obtain an arbitrary low income to finance their own consumption and fertility plans. If potential agents are identified by the dates in which they may be born, then A-efficiency reduces to dynastic maximization, which, in environments with finite-horizon altruism, drives the economy to a collapse in finite time. To deal with situations like those arising in economies with finite-horizon altruism, in which A-efficiency may be in conflict with individual rights, we propose to evaluate the efficiency of a given allocation with a particular class of specifications of P-efficiency for which the utility attributed to the unborn depends on the utility obtained by their living siblings. Under certain concavity assumptions on value functions, we also characterize every symmetric, P-efficient allocation as a Millian efficient allocation, that is, as a symmetric allocation that is not A-dominated-with the birth-order criterion-by any other symmetric allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 512
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Theory of Occupational Choice with Endogenous Fertility
    Mookherjee, Dilip
    Prina, Silvia
    Ray, Debraj
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2012, 4 (04) : 1 - 34
  • [32] Pension policies in a model with endogenous fertility
    Cipriani, Giam Pietro
    Pascucci, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF PENSION ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 19 (01): : 109 - 125
  • [33] Endogenous fertility, international migration and growth
    Giam Pietro Cipriani
    International Review of Economics, 2006, 53 (1) : 49 - 67
  • [34] Endogenous fertility and the design of family taxation
    Balestrino, A
    Cigno, A
    Pettini, A
    INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2002, 9 (02) : 175 - 193
  • [35] A THEORY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITH ENDOGENOUS FERTILITY
    Elgin, Ceyhun
    MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2012, 16 (05) : 686 - 705
  • [36] Pensions with heterogenous individuals and endogenous fertility
    Helmuth Cremer
    Firouz Gahvari
    Pierre Pestieau
    Journal of Population Economics, 2008, 21 : 961 - 981
  • [37] Income Distribution Dynamics with Endogenous Fertility
    Michael Kremer
    Daniel L. Chen
    Journal of Economic Growth, 2002, 7 : 227 - 258
  • [38] The dynamics of bequeathed tastes with endogenous fertility
    Gori, Luca
    Michetti, Elisabetta
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 149 : 79 - 82
  • [39] Income distribution dynamics with endogenous fertility
    Kremer, M
    Chen, DL
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2002, 7 (03) : 227 - 258
  • [40] Endogenous Fertility and the Design of Family Taxation
    Alessandro Balestrino
    Alessandro Cigno
    Anna Pettini
    International Tax and Public Finance, 2002, 9 : 175 - 193