Efficiency and endogenous fertility

被引:4
|
作者
Perez-Nievas, Mikel [1 ]
Conde-Ruiz, Jose I. [2 ,3 ]
Gimenez, Eduardo L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ 1, Madrid, Spain
[3] Fdn Estudios Econ Aplicada, Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Vigo, Dept Fundamentos Anal Econ, Hist & Inst Econ, Vigo, Spain
关键词
Efficiency; optimal population; endogenous fertility; A-efficiency; P-efficiency; Millian efficiency; birth-order criterion; birth-date criterion; OLG MODELS; POPULATION; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3982/TE2138
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the properties of the notions of A-efficiency and P-efficiency, which were proposed by Golosov et al. (2007), to evaluate allocations in a general overlapping generations setting in which fertility choices are endogenously selected from a continuum and any two agents of the same generation are identical. First, we show that the properties of A-efficient allocations vary depending on the criterion used to identify potential agents. If one identifies potential agents by their position in their siblings' birth order, as Golosov, Jones, and Ter-tilt do, then A-efficiency requires that a positive measure of agents use most of their endowment to maximize the utility of the dynasty head, which, in environments with finite-horizon altruism, implies that some agents-the youngest in every family-obtain an arbitrary low income to finance their own consumption and fertility plans. If potential agents are identified by the dates in which they may be born, then A-efficiency reduces to dynastic maximization, which, in environments with finite-horizon altruism, drives the economy to a collapse in finite time. To deal with situations like those arising in economies with finite-horizon altruism, in which A-efficiency may be in conflict with individual rights, we propose to evaluate the efficiency of a given allocation with a particular class of specifications of P-efficiency for which the utility attributed to the unborn depends on the utility obtained by their living siblings. Under certain concavity assumptions on value functions, we also characterize every symmetric, P-efficient allocation as a Millian efficient allocation, that is, as a symmetric allocation that is not A-dominated-with the birth-order criterion-by any other symmetric allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 512
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Millian Efficiency with Endogenous Fertility
    Ignacio Conde-Ruiz, J.
    Gimenez, Eduardo L.
    Perez-Nievas, Mikel
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2010, 77 (01): : 154 - 187
  • [2] Pareto-Efficiency and Endogenous Fertility: A Simple Model
    Michel, Philippe
    Wigniolle, Bertrand
    MATHEMATICAL POPULATION STUDIES, 2009, 16 (01) : 36 - 59
  • [3] Property rights and efficiency in OLG models with endogenous fertility
    Schoonbroodt, Alice
    Tertilt, Michele
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2014, 150 : 551 - 582
  • [4] Endogenous fertility, externalities, and efficiency in old-age pension systems
    von Auer, L
    Büttner, B
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2004, 160 (02): : 294 - 310
  • [5] A model of endogenous divorce and endogenous fertility
    Fan, CZS
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2001, 14 (01) : 101 - 117
  • [6] A model of endogenous divorce and endogenous fertility
    Chengze Simon Fan
    Journal of Population Economics, 2001, 14 : 101 - 117
  • [7] Endogenous fertility and growth dynamics
    Nishimura, K
    Raut, LK
    TRADE, GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF PROFESSOR T. N. SRINIVASAN, 1999, 242 : 39 - 53
  • [8] Endogenous fertility, mortality and growth
    Blackburn, K
    Cipriani, GP
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 1998, 11 (04) : 517 - 534
  • [9] NONNEUTRALITY OF DEBT WITH ENDOGENOUS FERTILITY
    WILDASIN, DE
    OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1990, 42 (02): : 414 - 428
  • [10] Endogenous fertility, mortality and growth
    Keith Blackburn
    Giam Pietro Cipriani
    Journal of Population Economics, 1998, 11 : 517 - 534