LIMITATIONS TO INTERORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION: THE PARADOX OF CORPORATE VENTURE CAPITAL

被引:235
作者
Dushnitsky, Gary [1 ]
Shaver, J. Myles [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
corporate entrepreneurship; venture capital; knowledge acquisition; alliance formation; innovation; mutual selection; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; ALLIANCE FORMATION; ACQUIRING FIRMS; GOVERNANCE; INVESTMENT; PERFORMANCE; MARKETS; IDEAS;
D O I
10.1002/smj.781
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
By highlighting conditions under which viable interorganizational relationships do not materialize, we explore the limitations of interorganizational knowledge acquisition. In the empirical context of corporate venture capital (CVC), we analyze a sample of 1,646 start-up-stage ventures that received funding during the 1990s. Under a regime of weak intellectual property protection (IPP), an entrepreneur-CVC investment relationship is less likely to form when the entrepreneurial invention targets the same industry), as corporate products. In contrast, under a strong IPP regime, industry overlap is associated with an increase in the likelihood of an investment relationship. Our findings suggest that many relationships do not form because the corporation will not invest unless the entrepreneur discloses his or her invention, and the entrepreneur may be wary of doing so, fearing imitation. To the extent that a CVC has greater capability and inclination to target same-industry ventures, such industry overlap would exacerbate imitation concerns under a weak IPP regime, yet facilitate an investment relationship under a strong IPP regime. Beyond CVC, this insight may explain patterns of other interorganizational relationships, including research and development alliances and technology licensing between start-ups and incumbents. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1064
页数:20
相关论文
共 120 条
[11]  
Anand BN, 2000, J IND ECON, V48, P103
[12]   TECHNOLOGICAL DISCONTINUITIES AND DOMINANT DESIGNS - A CYCLICAL MODEL OF TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE [J].
ANDERSON, P ;
TUSHMAN, ML .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (04) :604-633
[13]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Business Wire
[14]  
[Anonymous], 1999, NEW VENTURE CREATION
[15]  
[Anonymous], 1998, 6725 NBER
[16]  
[Anonymous], 1998, DYNAMICS LONG RUN GR
[17]   Markets for partially contractible knowledge: Bootstrapping versus bundling [J].
Anton, JJ ;
Yao, DA .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2005, 3 (2-3) :745-754
[18]  
ANTON JJ, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P190
[19]   The sale of ideas: Strategic disclosure, property rights, and contracting [J].
Anton, JJ ;
Yao, DA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2002, 69 (03) :513-531
[20]  
Arora Ashish., 1995, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, V4, P41, DOI DOI 10.1080/10438599500000013