On the Performance of One-Stage and Two-Stage Object Detectors in Autonomous Vehicles Using Camera Data

被引:112
|
作者
Carranza-Garcia, Manuel [1 ]
Torres-Mateo, Jesus [1 ]
Lara-Benitez, Pedro [1 ]
Garcia-Gutierrez, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Div Comp Sci, ES-41012 Seville, Spain
关键词
autonomous vehicles; convolutional neural networks; deep learning; object detection; transfer learning;
D O I
10.3390/rs13010089
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Object detection using remote sensing data is a key task of the perception systems of self-driving vehicles. While many generic deep learning architectures have been proposed for this problem, there is little guidance on their suitability when using them in a particular scenario such as autonomous driving. In this work, we aim to assess the performance of existing 2D detection systems on a multi-class problem (vehicles, pedestrians, and cyclists) with images obtained from the on-board camera sensors of a car. We evaluate several one-stage (RetinaNet, FCOS, and YOLOv3) and two-stage (Faster R-CNN) deep learning meta-architectures under different image resolutions and feature extractors (ResNet, ResNeXt, Res2Net, DarkNet, and MobileNet). These models are trained using transfer learning and compared in terms of both precision and efficiency, with special attention to the real-time requirements of this context. For the experimental study, we use the Waymo Open Dataset, which is the largest existing benchmark. Despite the rising popularity of one-stage detectors, our findings show that two-stage detectors still provide the most robust performance. Faster R-CNN models outperform one-stage detectors in accuracy, being also more reliable in the detection of minority classes. Faster R-CNN Res2Net-101 achieves the best speed/accuracy tradeoff but needs lower resolution images to reach real-time speed. Furthermore, the anchor-free FCOS detector is a slightly faster alternative to RetinaNet, with similar precision and lower memory usage.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Surgical treatment of an unstable varus knee: one-stage or two-stage?
    Felli L.
    Binazzi R.
    Biglieni L.
    La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, 2008, 92 (2): : 137 - 138
  • [22] Accuracy of the One-Stage and Two-Stage Impression Techniques: A Comparative Analysis
    Jamshidy, Ladan
    Mozaffari, Hamid Reza
    Faraji, Payam
    Sharifi, Roohollah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 2016
  • [23] When Do Two-Stage Processes Outperform One-Stage Processes?
    Klamt, Steffen
    Mahadevan, Radhakrishnan
    Haedicke, Oliver
    BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 13 (02)
  • [24] One-stage versus two-stage spinal fusion in neuromuscular scolioses
    Hopf, CG
    Eysel, P
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2000, 9 (04): : 234 - 243
  • [25] Comparing One-Stage vs Two-Stage Approaches for the Management of Choledocholithiasis
    Obada Kattih
    Vic Velanovich
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023, 27 : 534 - 543
  • [26] One-stage vs two-stage cartilage repair: a current review
    Meyerkort, Daniel
    Wood, David
    Zheng, Ming-Hao
    ORTHOPEDIC RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2010, 2 : 95 - 106
  • [27] ONE-STAGE OR TWO-STAGE CERVICAL ESOPHAGOCOLOSTOMY OR ILEOSTOMY FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE ESOPHAGUS
    CHRYSOSPATHIS, P
    GOLEMATIS, B
    CAMPANIS, N
    SURGERY, 1961, 49 (04) : 429 - 432
  • [28] Outcomes of one-stage and two-stage aneurysm repair in arteriovenous fistulae
    Yan, Qi
    Davies, Mark G.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 79 (03)
  • [29] Autonomous Two-stage Object Retrieval Using Supervised and Reinforcement Learning
    Rouillard, Thibault
    Howard, Ian
    Cui, Lei
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (ICMA), 2019, : 780 - 786
  • [30] Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ
    Burke, Danielle L.
    Ensor, Joie
    Riley, Richard D.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (05) : 855 - 875