Consistency of small-field dosimetry, on and off axis, in beam-matched linacs used for stereotactic radiosurgery

被引:6
|
作者
Munoz, Luis [1 ,2 ]
Kron, Tomas [2 ,3 ]
Petasecca, Marco [2 ]
Bucci, Joseph [4 ,5 ]
Jackson, Michael [2 ,6 ]
Metcalfe, Peter [2 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly B. [2 ]
Biasi, Giordano [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Genesiscare Flinders Private Hosp, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] St George Hosp, St George Canc Care Ctr, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
[5] Genesiscare Waratah Private Hosp, Hurstville, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
Elekta; matched linacs; off-axis; small-field dosimetry; SRS; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; ARRAY; DETECTOR;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13160
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be delivered with a standard linear accelerator (linac). At institutions having more than one linac, beam matching is common practice. In the literature, there are indications that machine central axis (CAX) matching for broad fields does not guarantee matching of small fields with side <= 2 cm. There is no indication on how matching for broad fields on axis translates to matching small fields off axis. These are of interest to multitarget single-isocenter (MTSI) SRS planning and the present work addresses that gap in the literature. Methods: We used 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) beams from four Elekta VersaHD (R) linacs equipped with an Agility (TM) multileaf collimator (MLC). The linacs were strictly matched for broad fields on CAX. We compared output factors (OPFs) and effective field size, measured concurrently using a novel 2D solid-state dosimeter "Duo" with a spatial resolution of 0.2 mm, in square and rectangular static fields with sides from 0.5 to 2 cm, either on axis or away from it by 5 to 15 cm. Results: Among the four linacs, OPF for fields >= 1 x 1 cm(2) ranged 1.3% on CAX, whereas off axis a maximum range of 1.9% was observed at 15 cm. A larger variability in OPF was noted for the 0.5 x 0.5 cm(2) field, with a range of 5.9% on CAX, which improved to a maximum of 2.3% moving off axis. Two linacs showed greater consistency with a range of 1.4% on CAX and 2.2% at 15 cm off axis. Between linacs, the effective field size varied by <0.04 cm in most cases, both on and off axis. Tighter matching was observed for linacs with a similar focal spot position. Conclusions: Verification of small-field consistency for matched linacs used for SRS is an important task for dosimetric validation. A significant benefit of concurrent measurement of field size and OPF allowed for a comprehensive assessment using a novel diode array. Our study showed the four linacs, strictly matched for broad fields on CAX, were still matched down to a field size of 1 x 1 cm(2) on and off axis.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Portal Dosimetry Comparison for Three Beam-Matched Varian TrueBeam LINACs
    Yang, K.
    Jiang, W.
    Patel, R.
    Sharma, S.
    Ju, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E829 - E829
  • [2] Dosimetry On Beam Modeling at the Small Field for Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Jung, J.
    Kim, M.
    Yoon, D.
    Suh, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [3] Detector choice for small-field Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) beam characterisation
    Suchowerska, N.
    Tyler, M. K.
    Liu, P. Z. Y.
    Chan, K. W.
    Ralston, A.
    McKenzie, D.
    Downes, S. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S57 - S58
  • [4] SMALL FIELD DOSIMETRY AND BEAM DATA ACQUISITION FOR STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY
    Antoine, C.
    Heyes, G.
    Manolopoulos, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S419 - S419
  • [5] Small-beam dosimetry of stereotactic radiosurgery
    Waldeland, E.
    Lervag, C.
    Ramberg, C.
    Tvera, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S295 - S295
  • [6] Micro-mosfet For Small-field In Vivo Dosimetry In Radiosurgery?
    Sors, A.
    Cassol, E.
    Latorzeff, I.
    Duthil, P.
    Lotterie, J.
    Redon, A.
    Berry, I.
    Franceries, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S870 - S870
  • [7] Characterization of small-field stereotactic radiosurgery beams with modern detectors
    Tyler, Madelaine
    Liu, Paul Z. Y.
    Chan, Kin Wa
    Ralston, Anna
    McKenzie, David R.
    Downes, Simon
    Suchowerska, Natalka
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (21): : 7595 - 7608
  • [8] Application of high-resolution radiochromic film dosimetry in verifying a small-field stereotactic radiosurgery plan
    Lee, K. Y.
    Fung, Karl K. L.
    Kwok, C. S.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2006, 64 (08) : 934 - 939
  • [9] Is there a general Procedure for Optimizing the Beam Model in the TPS using standard Small-field Dosimetry for stereotactic Radiation?
    Kirchhefer, J.
    Gutzeit, A.
    Loot, K.
    Rohn, R.
    Waletzko, O.
    Block, A.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 198 (SUPPL 1) : S135 - S136
  • [10] An overview on small-field dosimetry in photon beam radiotherapy: Developments and challenges
    Bagheri, Hamed
    Soleimani, Azadeh
    Gharehaghaji, Nahideh
    Mesbahi, Asghar
    Manouchehri, Farhad
    Shekarchi, Babak
    Dormanesh, Banafsheh
    Dadgar, Habib Alah
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 13 (02) : 175 - 185