Learning communication from erroneous video-based examples: A double-blind randomised controlled trial

被引:33
|
作者
Schmitz, Felix Michael [1 ]
Schnabel, Kai Philipp [1 ]
Stricker, Daniel [1 ]
Fischer, Martin Rudolf [2 ]
Guttormsen, Sissel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Med Educ, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Inst Med Educ, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
Communication skills learning; Worked examples; Erroneous examples; Self-explanation prompts; Elaborated feedback; Schemas; Scripts; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; BREAKING BAD-NEWS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; WORKED EXAMPLES; CENTERED COMMUNICATION; DIAGNOSTIC KNOWLEDGE; SELF-EXPLANATIONS; TRAINING-PROGRAM; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.016
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Appropriate training strategies are required to equip undergraduate healthcare students to benefit from communication training with simulated patients. This study examines the learning effects of different formats of video-based worked examples on initial communication skills. Methods: First-year nursing students (N = 36) were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups (correct v. erroneous examples) or to the control group (no examples). All the groups were provided an identical introduction to learning materials on breaking bad news; the experimental groups also received a set of video-based worked examples. Each example was accompanied by a self-explanation prompt (considering the example's correctness) and elaborated feedback (the true explanation). Results: Participants presented with erroneous examples broke bad news to a simulated patient significantly more appropriately than students in the control group. Additionally, they tended to outperform participants who had correct examples, while participants presented with correct examples tended to outperform the control group. Conclusion: The worked example effect was successfully adapted for learning in the provider-patient communication domain. Practice Implications: Implementing video-based worked examples with self-explanation prompts and feedback can be an effective strategy to prepare students for their training with simulated patients, especially when examples are erroneous. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1212
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Methylphenidate, modafinil, and caffeine for cognitive enhancement in chess: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial
    Franke, Andreas G.
    Gransmark, Patrik
    Agricola, Alexandra
    Schuehle, Kai
    Ronnmel, Thilo
    Sebastian, Alexandra
    Ballo, Harald E.
    Gorbulev, Stanislav
    Gerdes, Christer
    Frank, Bjorn
    Ruckes, Christian
    Tuescher, Oliver
    Lieb, Klaus
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 248 - 260
  • [42] Subcutaneous sumatriptan: results of a peculiar, unpublished, comparative, double-blind, randomised, and controlled trial
    Tfelt-Hansen, Peer
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2011, 12 (02): : 269 - 270
  • [43] Double-blind randomised controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate spray for external cephalic version
    Yanny, H
    Johanson, R
    Baldwin, KJ
    Lucking, L
    Fitzpatrick, R
    Jones, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (04): : 562 - 564
  • [44] Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of EPs 7630 in adults with COPD
    Matthys, Heinrich
    Pliskevich, Dina A.
    Bondarchuk, Oleksandr M.
    Malek, Fathi A.
    Tribanek, Michael
    Kieser, Meinhard
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 107 (05) : 691 - 701
  • [45] Irbesartan in Marfan syndrome (AIMS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial
    Mullen, Michael
    Jin, Xu Yu
    Child, Anne
    Stuart, A. Graham
    Dodd, Matthew
    Aragon-Martin, Jose Antonio
    Gaze, David
    Kiotsekoglou, Anatoli
    Yuan, Li
    Hu, Jiangting
    Foley, Claire
    Van Dyck, Laura
    Knight, Rosemary
    Clayton, Tim
    Swan, Lorna
    Thomson, John D. R.
    Erdem, Guliz
    Crossman, David
    Flather, Marcus
    LANCET, 2019, 394 (10216): : 2263 - 2270
  • [46] Montelukast for postinfectious cough in adults: a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial
    Wang, Kay
    Birring, Surinder S.
    Taylor, Kathryn
    Fry, Norman K.
    Hay, Alastair D.
    Moore, Michael
    Jin, Jing
    Perera, Rafael
    Farmer, Andrew
    Little, Paul
    Harrison, Timothy G.
    Mant, David
    Harnden, Anthony
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (01): : 35 - 43
  • [47] TRYMS: the ethical and practical considerations of a double-blind placebo controlled randomised clinical trial
    Swain, Jayne
    Smith, Isabelle
    Smith, Alexandra
    Walsh, Jennifer
    Ross, Richard
    Marshall, Helen
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [48] Double-blind randomised controlled trial of lofexidine versus clonidine in the treatment of heroin withdrawal
    Lin, SK
    Strang, J
    Su, LW
    Tsai, CJ
    Hu, WH
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1997, 48 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [49] Subcutaneous sumatriptan: results of a peculiar, unpublished, comparative, double-blind, randomised, and controlled trial
    Peer Tfelt-Hansen
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2011, 12 : 269 - 270
  • [50] Intrauterine lignocaine as an anaesthetic during endometrial sampling: a randomised double-blind controlled trial
    Hui, SK
    Lee, L
    Ong, C
    Yu, V
    Ho, LC
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (01) : 53 - 57