Effects of a magnetic palatal expansion appliance with reactivation system: An animal experiment

被引:5
|
作者
Tong, Fei [1 ]
Liu, Fen [1 ]
Liu, Jiali [1 ]
Xiao, Chang [1 ]
Liu, Jian [1 ]
Wu, Jianyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Stomatol Hosp, Dept Orthodont, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
NEODYMIUM-IRON-BORON; FORCE APPLICATION; DIAMOND; POINTS; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.06.030
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a newly designed magnetic palatal expansion appliance with a reactivation system. Methods: A magnetic palatal expansion appliance was designed based on the repulsion forces of neodymium-iron-boron magnets combined with a reactivation system. Eighteen prepubertal male beagle dogs were assigned randomly to the magnetic expansion (ME) group, the mechanical screw expansion (SE) group, or the control group. Two pairs of nonmagnetic metal bone marker implants were inserted into palatal bone bilaterally 3 mm lateral to the midpalatal suture and in line with the first and fourth premolars, respectively, in each dog. The 6 animals in each group received (1) newly designed magnetic expanders, (2) jackscrew expanders, or (3) no expansion appliance. Expansion was stopped after 4 weeks when 6 mm of activation was achieved in the 2 treated groups. Three-dimensional evaluations of dental and skeletal effects were performed with cone-beam computed tomography. Histologic examinations were conducted using light microscopy to observe morphologic changes in the midpalatal suture after hematoxylin and eosin staining. Results: The absolute transversal changes of both treated groups before and after expansion were significantly greater than those in the control group in all parameters (P < 0.001). The differences of the distances of bilateral canines in the ME group were significantly greater than in the SE group (1.04 +/- 0.16 mm; P < 0.001); the differences of the distances between implants adjacent to the first premolars (0.77 +/- 0.06 mm; P < 0.001) and the distances between implants adjacent to the fourth premolars (0.37 +/- 0.06 mm; P < 0.001) in the SE group were significantly greater than in the ME group. Histologic observations of the palatal sutures in the ME and SE groups, when compared with the control group, showed widening of the sutures and many fibroblasts in an active, proliferative state. Counts of osteoblasts were increased in both expansion groups. Counts of osteoclasts were increased in the SE group. Conclusions: Both appliances expanded the maxilla effectively and induced processes of bone remodeling of the midpalatal sutures during expansion. The new magnetic palatal expansion appliances produced a smaller skeletal effect and a greater dental effect than did the mechanical screw palatal expansion appliances.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 142
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Treatment and posttreatment effects of a novel magnetic palatal expansion appliance with reactivation system in dogs
    Tong, Fei
    Miao, Zhanqi
    Zhou, Xingchen
    Xiao, Chang
    Wu, Jianyong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 157 (02) : 194 - 204
  • [3] PALATAL EXPANSION USING A BONDED APPLIANCE - REPORT OF A CASE
    HOWE, RP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1982, 82 (06) : 464 - 468
  • [4] A second look at differences in palatal expansion by type of appliance - Response
    Da Silveira, A
    Oliveira, N
    Viana, G
    Kusnoto, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 127 (03) : 277 - 277
  • [5] "Appliance First" or "Bone First" for miniscrew assisted rapid palatal expansion?
    Liou, Eric
    APOS TRENDS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 12 (01) : 1 - 4
  • [6] Production Methods for Manufacturing an Orthodontic Palatal Expansion Appliance - Focus on Digital Workflow
    Bolkart, Johannes
    Spintzyk, Sebastian
    Mann, Nils Kristian
    Koos, Bernd
    Xepapadeas, Alexander B.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2021, 53 (02): : 143 - 152
  • [7] STABILITY OF MAGNETIC VERSUS MECHANICAL PALATAL EXPANSION
    VARDIMON, AD
    GRABER, TM
    VOSS, LR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1989, 11 (02) : 107 - 115
  • [8] A clinical comparison of maxillary expansion: TransForce transverse appliance versus NiTi palatal expander
    Nagrik, Arun Parmeshwar
    Bhad, Wasundhara A.
    JOURNAL OF THE WORLD FEDERATION OF ORTHODONTISTS, 2014, 3 (02) : E61 - E65
  • [9] Effect of orthodontic appliance reactivation during the period of peak expansion in the osteoclast population
    Hughes, B
    King, GJ
    ANATOMICAL RECORD, 1998, 251 (01): : 80 - 86
  • [10] Efficient palatal expansion with a quadhelix appliance: an in vitro study using an experimental dental arch model
    Honme, Yoshito
    Motoyoshi, Mitsuru
    Shinohara, Akihiko
    Shigeeda, Toru
    Shimizu, Noriyoshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2012, 34 (04) : 442 - 446