Pragmatic trials can be designed as optimal medical care: principles and methods of care trials

被引:78
|
作者
Raymond, Jean [1 ]
Darsaut, Tim E. [2 ]
Altman, Douglas G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Radiol, Notre Dame Hosp, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta Hosp, Mackenzie Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Botnar Res Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
关键词
Clinical trials; Methodology; Research ethics; Clinical practice; Pragmatic trials; Evidence-based medicine; CLINICAL CARE; TEAM TRIAL; ANEURYSMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.010
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The way clinical research and care are currently separated encourages the practice of unverifiable medicine. Some pragmatic trials can be designed (1) to guide proper medical conduct in the presence of uncertainty and (2) to govern the distinction between unvalidated and validated care. Methods: Care trials are simple randomized trials integrated into a practice they regulate in the interest of present patients. The fundamental principle guiding the design of a care trial is the protection of the patient being offered medical care that has not yet been validated. Selection criteria are inclusive, to assist most current patients confronted with the problem. The trial entails no extra tests or risks beyond what is proven beneficial. Endpoints are pre-defined, simple, valuable and resistant to bias. Follow-up visits and tests are routine. Data is collected in simple case-report forms. Results: Care trials protect present patients from both unverifiable medicine and research performed for extraneous interests. They provide prudent care when evidence is lacking. They should not be obstructed by the need for separate funding, or by bureaucracy. Conclusion: Care trials can identify which medical alternative should be standard therapy. In the meantime, they provide optimal care in the presence of uncertainty. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The design of pragmatic trials with a "usual care" control group: results of a systematic review
    Smelt, A.
    van der Weele, G.
    Blom, J.
    Gussekloo, J.
    Assendelft, P.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (33-34) : 132S - 132S
  • [32] Career development in pragmatic clinical trials to improve care for people living with dementia
    Gabbard, Jennifer
    Sadarangani, Tina R.
    Datta, Rupak
    Fabius, Chanee D.
    Gettel, Cameron J.
    Douglas, Natalie F.
    Juckett, Lisa A.
    Kiselica, Andrew M.
    Murali, Komal Patel
    McCarthy, Ellen P.
    Torke, Alexia M.
    Callahan, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 (11) : 3554 - 3565
  • [33] Embedded Pragmatic Trials in Dementia Care: Realizing the Vision of the NIA IMPACT Collaboratory
    Mitchell, Susan L.
    Mor, Vincent
    Harrison, Jill
    McCarthy, Ellen P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 : S1 - S7
  • [34] Pragmatic Trials in Long-Term Care: Implementation and Dissemination Challenges and Opportunities
    Levy, Cari
    Zimmerman, Sheryl
    Mor, Vincent
    Gifford, David
    Greenberg, Sherry A.
    Klinger, Juliet Holt
    Lieblich, Cathy
    Linnebur, Sunny
    McAllister, Angie
    Nazir, Arif
    Pace, Douglas
    Stone, Robyn
    Resnick, Barbara
    Sloane, Philip D.
    Ouslander, Joseph
    Gaugler, Joseph E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2022, 70 (03) : 709 - 717
  • [35] Taking clinical decisions seriously in standard-of-care pragmatic clinical trials
    Astrachan, Isabel M.
    Flory, James
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 21 (06) : 669 - 670
  • [36] Experience using pragmatic care trials to guide neurovascular practice under uncertainty
    Darsaut, T. E.
    Raymond, J.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2020, 66 (06) : 423 - 428
  • [37] Selecting outcomes for pragmatic clinical trials in dementia care: The IMPACT Collaboratory iLibrary
    Hanson, Laura C.
    Wessell, Kathryn
    Meeks, Natalie
    Bennett, Antonia V.
    Toles, Mark
    Niznik, Josh
    Zimmerman, Sheryl
    Carpenter, Joan
    Ritchie, Christine S.
    Ernecoff, Natalie C.
    Saliba, Debra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024, 72 (02) : 529 - 535
  • [38] Preparing for pragmatic trials in dementia care: Health equity considerations for nonpharmacological interventions
    Aranda, Maria P.
    Baier, Rosa
    Hinton, Ladson
    Peak, Katherine D.
    Jackson, Jonathan D.
    Dilworth-Anderson, Peggye
    Gitlin, Laura N.
    Jutkowitz, Eric
    Quinones, Ana R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2023, 71 (12) : 3874 - 3885
  • [39] Integrating health equity into a national infrastructure to support pragmatic trials in dementia care
    McCarthy, Ellen P.
    Quinones, Ana R.
    Hinton, Ladson
    Harrison, Jill
    Mitchell, Susan L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024, 72 (10) : 3283 - 3287
  • [40] Pragmatic Trials in Long-Term Care: Implementation and Dissemination Challenges and Opportunities
    Levy, Cari
    Zimmerman, Sheryl
    Mor, Vincent
    Gifford, David
    Greenberg, Sherry A.
    Klinger, Juliet Holt
    Lieblich, Cathy
    Linnebur, Sunny
    McAllister, Angie
    Nazir, Arif
    Pace, Douglas
    Stone, Robyn
    Resnick, Barbara
    Sloane, Philip D.
    Ouslander, Joseph
    Gaugler, Joseph E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (03) : 339 - 344