Pragmatic trials can be designed as optimal medical care: principles and methods of care trials

被引:78
|
作者
Raymond, Jean [1 ]
Darsaut, Tim E. [2 ]
Altman, Douglas G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Radiol, Notre Dame Hosp, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta Hosp, Mackenzie Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Neurosurg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Botnar Res Ctr, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
关键词
Clinical trials; Methodology; Research ethics; Clinical practice; Pragmatic trials; Evidence-based medicine; CLINICAL CARE; TEAM TRIAL; ANEURYSMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.010
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The way clinical research and care are currently separated encourages the practice of unverifiable medicine. Some pragmatic trials can be designed (1) to guide proper medical conduct in the presence of uncertainty and (2) to govern the distinction between unvalidated and validated care. Methods: Care trials are simple randomized trials integrated into a practice they regulate in the interest of present patients. The fundamental principle guiding the design of a care trial is the protection of the patient being offered medical care that has not yet been validated. Selection criteria are inclusive, to assist most current patients confronted with the problem. The trial entails no extra tests or risks beyond what is proven beneficial. Endpoints are pre-defined, simple, valuable and resistant to bias. Follow-up visits and tests are routine. Data is collected in simple case-report forms. Results: Care trials protect present patients from both unverifiable medicine and research performed for extraneous interests. They provide prudent care when evidence is lacking. They should not be obstructed by the need for separate funding, or by bureaucracy. Conclusion: Care trials can identify which medical alternative should be standard therapy. In the meantime, they provide optimal care in the presence of uncertainty. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1156
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Practicing outcome-based medical care using pragmatic care trials
    Darsaut, Tim E.
    Raymond, Jean
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [2] Practicing outcome-based medical care using pragmatic care trials
    Tim E. Darsaut
    Jean Raymond
    Trials, 21
  • [3] Pragmatic trials in a routine care setting
    Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2009, 103 (06): : 404 - 409
  • [4] Randomized Trials in Primary Care: Becoming Pragmatic
    Marino, Miguel
    Heintzman, John
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (03) : 201 - 202
  • [5] Systematic Review of the "Pragmatism" of Pragmatic Critical Care Trials
    Palakshappa, Jessica A.
    Gibbs, Kevin W.
    Lannan, Margo T.
    Cranford, Anna R.
    Taylor, Stephanie P.
    CRITICAL CARE EXPLORATIONS, 2022, 4 (07) : E0738
  • [6] Clinical trials and the cost of medical care
    Conti, CR
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 22 (09) : 549 - 550
  • [7] STATISTICS IN MEDICINE Pragmatic Trials - Guides to Better Patient Care?
    Ware, James H.
    Hamel, Mary Beth
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (18): : 1685 - 1687
  • [8] Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care
    Dickert, Neal W.
    Wendler, David
    Devireddy, Chandan M.
    Goldkind, Sara F.
    Ko, Yi-An
    Speight, Candace D.
    Kim, Scott Y. H.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 15 (06) : 567 - 578
  • [9] Alternative Consent Models in Pragmatic Palliative Care Clinical Trials
    Carpenter, Joan G.
    Ulrich, Connie
    Hodgson, Nancy
    Hanson, Laura C.
    Ersek, Mary
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2021, 62 (01) : 183 - 191
  • [10] Evaluating the Pragmatism of Pragmatic Critical Care Trials: A Systematic Review
    Palakshappa, J. A.
    Gibbs, K. W.
    Lannan, M.
    Cranford, A.
    Taylor, S. P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205