Visualization of Complex Situations to Strengthen Human-Automation Collaboration

被引:1
|
作者
Zohrevandi, Elmira [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Inst Sci & Technol, Norrkoping, Sweden
关键词
High-stake environments; complex situations; information design; information visualization; air traffic control; human-automation collaboration; ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN;
D O I
10.1145/3335082.3335120
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Automation in today's world has helped human operators accomplish several tasks in limited time. Therefore, humans' role in automated environments are shifting from operational tasks to supervisory tasks. In complex environments such as air traffic control, supervisory tasks become difficult to manage during unforeseen situations as the controller needs to have a clear understanding of different operational levels in the system and make decisions about them in a limited amount of time. For the operators working with highly complex information-rich automated systems, an improper way of presenting the information would waste operator's cognitive resources resulting in inefficient decision making and increase in risk of failure. In this research proposal goals and plans are described for doing research on design and visualization of information specifically applied to high stake automated environments. The research project initially addresses the problem in the domain of air traffic control. The contribution of the project to the field so far has been design and development of an interactive tool, which visualizes the information about conflict solution space to facilitate decision making process. The research project is planned to be completed over the course of a four-year PhD studies.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 18
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Blame Attribution Asymmetry in Human-Automation Cooperation
    Liu, Peng
    Du, Yong
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2022, 42 (08) : 1769 - 1783
  • [32] Team Communication Behaviors of the Human-Automation Teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL MULTI-DISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE METHODS IN SITUATION AWARENESS AND DECISION SUPPORT (COGSIMA), 2016, : 28 - 34
  • [33] Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces
    Kunze, Alexander
    Summerskill, Stephen J.
    Marshall, Russell
    Filtness, Ashleigh J.
    ERGONOMICS, 2019, 62 (03) : 345 - 360
  • [34] A human-automation interface model to guide automation design of system functions
    Kennedy, Joshua S.
    McCauley, Michael E.
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2007, 119 (01) : 109 - 124
  • [35] The Activated Failures of Human-Automation Interactions on the Flight Deck
    Li, Wen-Chin
    Greaves, Matthew
    Durando, Davide
    Lin, John J. H.
    JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS AND AVIATION, 2016, 48 (03): : 163 - 171
  • [36] Using PPT to Analyze Suboptimal Human-Automation Performance
    Rice, Stephen
    Trafimow, David
    Hunt, Gayle
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 137 (03): : 310 - 329
  • [37] Investigation on the impact of human-automation interaction in maritime operations
    Pazouki, Kayvan
    Forbes, Neil
    Norman, Rosemary A.
    Woodward, Michael D.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 153 : 297 - 304
  • [38] Human-Automation Interaction Research: Past, Present, and Future
    Hancock, Peter A.
    Jagacinski, Richard J.
    Parasuraman, Raja
    Wickens, Christopher D.
    Wilson, Glenn F.
    Kaber, David B.
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2013, 21 (02) : 9 - 14
  • [39] Checking formal verification models for human-automation interaction
    van Paassen, M. M.
    Bolton, Matthew L.
    Jimenez, Noelia
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2014, : 3709 - 3714
  • [40] A systematic approach to predict performance of human-automation systems
    Howard, Ayarma M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART C-APPLICATIONS AND REVIEWS, 2007, 37 (04): : 594 - 601