Process-based models for forest ecosystem management:: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation

被引:0
|
作者
Mäkelä, A
Landsberg, J
Ek, AR
Burk, TE
Ter-Mikaelian, M
Ågren, GI
Oliver, CD
Puttonen, P
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Ecol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Landsberg Consulting, Canberra, ACT 2614, Australia
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Forest Resources, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[4] Ontario Forest Res Inst, Sault Ste Marie, ON P6A 5N5, Canada
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Ecol & Environm Res, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Washington, Coll Forest Resources, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
carbon allocation; carbon balance; competition; stand productivity; tree growth;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Recent progress toward the application of process-based models in forest management includes the development of evaluation and parameter estimation methods suitable for models with causal structure, and the accumulation of data that can be used in model evaluation. The current state of the art of process modeling is discussed in the context of forest ecosystem management. We argue that the carbon balance approach is readily applicable for projecting forest yield and productivity, and review several carbon balance models for estimating stand productivity and individual tree growth and competition. We propose that to develop operational models, it is necessary to accept that all models may have both empirical and causal components at the system level. We present examples of hybrid carbon balance models and consider issues that currently require incorporation of empirical information at the system level. We review model calibration and validation methods that take account of the hybrid character of models. The operational implementation of process-based models to practical forest management is discussed. Methods of decision-making in forest management are gradually moving toward a more general, analytical approach, and it seems likely that models that include some process-oriented components will soon be used in forestry enterprises. This development is likely to run parallel with the further development of ecophysiologically based models.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 298
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Process versus empirical models: Which approach for forest ecosystem management?
    Korzukhin, MD
    TerMikaelian, MT
    Wagner, RG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1996, 26 (05) : 879 - 887
  • [22] Common data environments in construction: state-of-the-art and challenges for practical implementation
    Jaskula, Klaudia
    Kifokeris, Dimosthenis
    Papadonikolaki, Eleni
    Rovas, Dimitrios
    CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2024,
  • [23] Forest management models and combinatorial algorithms: analysis of state of the art
    Andres Weintraub
    Richard L. Church
    Alan T. Murray
    Monique Guignard
    Annals of Operations Research, 2000, 96 : 271 - 285
  • [24] Forest management models and combinatorial algorithms: analysis of state of the art
    Weintraub, A
    Church, RL
    Murray, AT
    Guignard, M
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2000, 96 (1-4) : 271 - 285
  • [25] Net Primary Production Simulation and Influencing Factors Analysis of Forest Ecosystem Based on a Process-Based Model
    Yang, Zhu
    Huang, Xuanrui
    Qing, Yunxian
    Li, Hongqian
    Hong, Libin
    Lu, Wei
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (23):
  • [26] Empirical and process-based approaches to climate-induced forest mortality models
    Adams, Henry D.
    Williams, A. Park
    Xu, Chonggang
    Rauscher, Sara A.
    Jiang, Xiaoyan
    McDowell, Nate G.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2013, 4
  • [27] The process-based forest growth model 3-PG for use in forest management: A review
    Gupta, Rajit
    Sharma, Laxmi Kant
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2019, 397 : 55 - 73
  • [28] Generalization and evaluation of the process-based forest ecosystem model PnET-CN for other biomes
    Thorn, Alexandra M.
    Xiao, Jingfeng
    Ollinger, Scott V.
    ECOSPHERE, 2015, 6 (03):
  • [29] A new scheme for initializing process-based ecosystem models by scaling soil carbon pools
    Hashimoto, S.
    Wattenbach, M.
    Smith, P.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2011, 222 (19) : 3598 - 3602
  • [30] Reliably predicting pollinator abundance: Challenges of calibrating process-based ecological models
    Gardner, Emma
    Breeze, Tom D.
    Clough, Yann
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Baldock, Katherine C. R.
    Campbell, Alistair
    Garratt, Michael P. D.
    Gillespie, Mark A. K.
    Kunin, William E.
    McKerchar, Megan
    Memmott, Jane
    Potts, Simon G.
    Senapathi, Deepa
    Stone, Graham N.
    Wackers, Felix
    Westbury, Duncan B.
    Wilby, Andrew
    Oliver, Tom H.
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 11 (12): : 1673 - 1689