Improvement in accuracy of defect size measurement by automatic defect classification

被引:1
|
作者
Samir, Bhamidipati [1 ]
Pereira, Mark [1 ]
Paninjath, Sankaranarayanan [1 ]
Jeon, Chan-Uk [2 ]
Chung, Dong-Hoon [2 ]
Yoon, Gi-Sung [2 ]
Jung, Hong-Yul [2 ]
机构
[1] Mentor Graph India Pvt Ltd 176, Bangalore 560066, Karnataka, India
[2] Samsung Elect Co Ltd, Semicond R&D Ctr, Hwaseong Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
来源
PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2015 | 2015年 / 9635卷
关键词
Automatic Defect Classification; ADC; mask blank; mask substrate; mask inspection; mask defect classification; mask repair; defect avoidance;
D O I
10.1117/12.2202511
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The blank mask defect review process involves detailed analysis of defects observed across a substrate's multiple preparation stages, such as cleaning and resist-coating. The detailed knowledge of these defects plays an important role in the eventual yield obtained by using the blank. Defect knowledge predominantly comprises of details such as the number of defects observed, and their accurate sizes. Mask usability assessment at the start of the preparation process, is crudely based on number of defects. Similarly, defect size gives an idea of eventual wafer defect printability. Furthermore, monitoring defect characteristics, specifically size and shape, aids in obtaining process related information such as cleaning or coating process efficiencies. Blank mask defect review process is largely manual in nature. However, the large number of defects, observed for latest technology nodes with reducing half-pitch sizes; and the associated amount of information, together make the process increasingly inefficient in terms of review time, accuracy and consistency. The usage of additional tools such as CDSEM may be required to further aid the review process resulting in increasing costs. Calibre (R) MDPAutoClassify (TM) provides an automated software alternative, in the form of a powerful analysis tool for fast, accurate, consistent and automatic classification of blank defects. Elaborate post-processing algorithms are applied on defect images generated by inspection machines, to extract and report significant defect information such as defect size, affecting defect printability and mask usability. The algorithm's capabilities are challenged by the variety and complexity of defects encountered, in terms of defect nature, size, shape and composition; and the optical phenomena occurring around the defect [1]. This paper mainly focuses on the results from the evaluation of Calibre (R) MDPAutoClassify (TM) product. The main objective of this evaluation is to assess the capability of accurately estimating the size of the defect from the inspection images automatically. The sensitivity to weak defect signals, filtering out noise to identify the defect signals and locating the defect in the images are key success factors. The performance of the tool is assessed on programmable defect masks and production masks from HVM production flow. Implementation of Calibre (R) MDPAutoClassify (TM) is projected to improve the accuracy of defect size as compared to what is reported by inspection machine, which is very critical for production, and the classification of defects will aid in arriving at appropriate dispositions like SEM review, repair and scrap.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhanced defect capture and analysis based on automatic defect classification at post-lithographic inspection
    Hance, B
    Ne'eman, I
    Skumanich, A
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL FOR MICROLITHOGRAPHY XIV, 2000, 3998 : 732 - 737
  • [32] Building an Automatic Defect Verification System Using Deep Neural Network for PCB Defect Classification
    Deng, Yu-Shan
    Luo, An-Chun
    Dai, Min-Ji
    2018 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FRONTIERS OF SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICFSP 2018), 2018, : 145 - 149
  • [33] DEFECT IMPROVEMENT
    MYERS, FS
    PHYSICS WORLD, 1992, 5 (02) : 12 - 12
  • [34] Defect Prevention with Orthogonal Defect Classification
    Shenvi, Ajit Ashok
    ISEC 2009 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INDIA SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2009, : 83 - 87
  • [35] Performance Evaluation of SG Tube Defect Size Estimation System in the Absence of Defect Type Classification
    Jo, Nam-Hoon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING, 2010, 30 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [36] Deep learning based automatic defect classification for semiconductor manufacturing
    Kim, Eunpa
    Shin, Myungchul
    Ahn, Hee-Jun
    Park, Soyoon
    Lee, Dong-Ryul
    Park, Haesung
    Shin, Minjung
    Ihm, Dongchul
    METROLOGY, INSPECTION, AND PROCESS CONTROL XXXVII, 2023, 12496
  • [37] Improve Mask Inspection Capacity with Automatic Defect Classification (ADC)
    Wang, Crystal
    Ho, Steven
    Guo, Eric
    Wang, Kechang
    Lakkapragada, Suresh
    Yu, Jiao
    Hu, Peter
    Tolani, Vikram
    Pang, Linyong
    PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2013, 2013, 8880
  • [38] CMP process development based on rapid automatic defect classification
    Skumanich, A
    Cai, MP
    IN-LINE CHARACTERIZATION, YIELD RELIABILITY, AND FAILURE ANALYSES IN MICROELECTRONIC MANUFACTURING, 1999, 3743 : 76 - 88
  • [39] AUTOMATIC DEFECT CLASSIFICATION OF PRINTED WIRING BOARD SOLDER JOINTS
    DRIELS, MR
    NOLAN, DJ
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPONENTS HYBRIDS AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 1990, 13 (02): : 331 - 340
  • [40] An industry survey of automatic defect classification technologies, methods, and performance
    Tobin, KW
    Lakhani, F
    Karnowski, TP
    DESIGN, PROCESS INTEGRATION, AND CHARACTERIZATION FOR MICROELECTRONICS, 2002, 4692 : 46 - 53