Improvement in accuracy of defect size measurement by automatic defect classification

被引:1
|
作者
Samir, Bhamidipati [1 ]
Pereira, Mark [1 ]
Paninjath, Sankaranarayanan [1 ]
Jeon, Chan-Uk [2 ]
Chung, Dong-Hoon [2 ]
Yoon, Gi-Sung [2 ]
Jung, Hong-Yul [2 ]
机构
[1] Mentor Graph India Pvt Ltd 176, Bangalore 560066, Karnataka, India
[2] Samsung Elect Co Ltd, Semicond R&D Ctr, Hwaseong Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
来源
PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2015 | 2015年 / 9635卷
关键词
Automatic Defect Classification; ADC; mask blank; mask substrate; mask inspection; mask defect classification; mask repair; defect avoidance;
D O I
10.1117/12.2202511
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The blank mask defect review process involves detailed analysis of defects observed across a substrate's multiple preparation stages, such as cleaning and resist-coating. The detailed knowledge of these defects plays an important role in the eventual yield obtained by using the blank. Defect knowledge predominantly comprises of details such as the number of defects observed, and their accurate sizes. Mask usability assessment at the start of the preparation process, is crudely based on number of defects. Similarly, defect size gives an idea of eventual wafer defect printability. Furthermore, monitoring defect characteristics, specifically size and shape, aids in obtaining process related information such as cleaning or coating process efficiencies. Blank mask defect review process is largely manual in nature. However, the large number of defects, observed for latest technology nodes with reducing half-pitch sizes; and the associated amount of information, together make the process increasingly inefficient in terms of review time, accuracy and consistency. The usage of additional tools such as CDSEM may be required to further aid the review process resulting in increasing costs. Calibre (R) MDPAutoClassify (TM) provides an automated software alternative, in the form of a powerful analysis tool for fast, accurate, consistent and automatic classification of blank defects. Elaborate post-processing algorithms are applied on defect images generated by inspection machines, to extract and report significant defect information such as defect size, affecting defect printability and mask usability. The algorithm's capabilities are challenged by the variety and complexity of defects encountered, in terms of defect nature, size, shape and composition; and the optical phenomena occurring around the defect [1]. This paper mainly focuses on the results from the evaluation of Calibre (R) MDPAutoClassify (TM) product. The main objective of this evaluation is to assess the capability of accurately estimating the size of the defect from the inspection images automatically. The sensitivity to weak defect signals, filtering out noise to identify the defect signals and locating the defect in the images are key success factors. The performance of the tool is assessed on programmable defect masks and production masks from HVM production flow. Implementation of Calibre (R) MDPAutoClassify (TM) is projected to improve the accuracy of defect size as compared to what is reported by inspection machine, which is very critical for production, and the classification of defects will aid in arriving at appropriate dispositions like SEM review, repair and scrap.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automatic defect classification: A productivity improvement tool
    Esposito, T
    Burns, M
    Morell, S
    Wang, E
    1997 IEEE/SEMI ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP - ASMC 97 PROCEEDINGS: THEME - THE QUEST FOR SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE: LEADING THE CHARGE INTO THE 21ST CENTURY, 1997, : 269 - 276
  • [2] Improvement of Multi-lines bridge Defect Classification by Hierarchical Architecture in Artificial Intelligence Automatic Defect Classification
    Lin, Bing-Sheng
    Cheng, Jung-Syuan
    Liao, Hsiang-Chou
    Yang, Ling-Wu
    Yang, Tahone
    Chen, Kuang-Chao
    2020 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING (ISSM), 2020,
  • [3] Improvement of Multi-Lines Bridge Defect Classification by Hierarchical Architecture in Artificial Intelligence Automatic Defect Classification
    Lin, Bing-Sheng
    Cheng, Jung-Syuan
    Liao, Hsiang-Chou
    Yang, Ling-Wu
    Yang, Tahone
    Chen, Kuang-Chao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 2021, 34 (03) : 346 - 351
  • [4] Improvement of the defect inspection process of deteriorated buildings with scan to BIM and image-based automatic defect classification
    Kang, Suhyun
    Kim, Seungho
    Kim, Sangyong
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2025, 99
  • [5] Automatic defect classification using boosting
    Lee, SH
    Kim, HI
    Cho, NI
    Jeong, YH
    Chung, KS
    Jun, CS
    ICMLA 2005: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 357 - 362
  • [6] Automatic defect classification for semiconductor manufacturing
    I.B.M., Yorktown Heights, United States
    Mach Vision Appl, 4 (201-214):
  • [7] In-line automatic defect classification
    Bennett, MH
    Garvin, JF
    Coldren, D
    1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : E29 - E30
  • [8] An automatic photomask defect classification method
    Yamashita, K
    Matsuki, K
    Akeno, K
    PHOTOMASK AND X-RAY MASK TECHNOLOGY III, 1996, 2793 : 279 - 287
  • [9] Evolving an automatic defect classification tool
    Glazer, Assaf
    Sipper, Moshe
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 4974 : 194 - 203
  • [10] Automatic defect classification for semiconductor manufacturing
    Paul B. Chou
    A. Ravishankar Rao
    Martin C. Sturzenbecker
    Frederick Y. Wu
    Virginia H. Brecher
    Machine Vision and Applications, 1997, 9 : 201 - 214