Comparison of excavation-induced wall deflection using top-down and bottom-up construction methods in Taipei silty clay

被引:36
|
作者
Kung, Gordon Tung-Chin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Sustainable Environm Res Ctr, Tainan 70944, Taiwan
关键词
Excavation; Case history; Clay; Finite element method; Creep; BRACED EXCAVATIONS; DEEP EXCAVATIONS; GROUND MOVEMENTS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compgeo.2008.07.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This paper compares the excavation-induced wall deflection caused by the top-down method (TDM) and the bottom-up method (BUM). First, a total of 26 quality excavation case histories in Taipei silty clay were collected and analyzed. The field observations show that the maximum lateral wall deflection (delta(hm)) induced by the TDM were 1.28 times as large as that induced by the BUM. Factors affecting wall deflection are investigated and four of them are selected for further numerical experimentation to investigate the discrepancy of delta(hm) caused by the two methods. Analysis results showed that the average ratio of delta(hm) induced by the TDM over that induced by the BUM is approximately equal to 1.1, excluding the effect of thermal shrinkage of concrete floor slabs. Both observed data and analysis results revealed that greater delta(hm), is generally induced by the TDM despite its use of floor slabs with higher support stiffness. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 385
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty
    Lee, Jun Hyung
    Choi, Jee-Hye
    Youn, Jae Saeng
    Cha, Young Joo
    Song, Woonheung
    Park, Ae Ja
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 53 (07) : 1025 - 1032
  • [22] A Comparison of "Bottom-Up" and "Top-Down" Approaches to the Synthesis of Pt/C Electrocatalysts
    Kuriganova, Alexandra
    Faddeev, Nikita
    Gorshenkov, Mikhail
    Kuznetsov, Dmitri
    Leontyev, Igor
    Smirnova, Nina
    PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (08)
  • [23] Corporate and Grassroot Frugal Innovation: A Comparison of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies
    Wohlfart, Liza
    Bunger, Mark
    Lang-Koetz, Claus
    Wagner, Frank
    TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2016, 6 (04): : 5 - 17
  • [24] COMPARISON OF BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN APPROACHES TO CALCULATING THE WATER FOOTPRINTS OF NATIONS
    Feng, Kuishuang
    Chapagain, Ashok
    Suh, Sangwon
    Pfister, Stephan
    Hubacek, Klaus
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 23 (04) : 371 - 385
  • [25] Top-down or bottom-up digital transformation? A comparison of institutional changes and outcomes
    Marienfeldt, Justine
    Wehmeier, Liz Marla
    Kuhlmann, Sabine
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [26] A Comparison of Bottom-up and Top-down Modelling Approaches in Urban Energy Simulation
    Willmann, Anja
    Katscher, Lara
    Leiser, Thomas
    Voelker, Conrad
    PROCEEDINGS OF BUILDING SIMULATION 2019: 16TH CONFERENCE OF IBPSA, 2020, : 3303 - 3310
  • [27] A comparison study of bottom-up and top-down methods for analyzing the physical composition of municipal solid waste
    Zhou, Chuanbin
    Ma, Shijun
    Yu, Xiao
    Chen, Zhuqi
    Liu, Jingru
    Yan, Li
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2022, 26 (01) : 240 - 251
  • [28] Commentary: Top-down and bottom-up modulation of pain-induced oscillations
    Nicolardi, Valentina
    Valentini, Elia
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10 : 1 - 3
  • [29] Face Segmentation Using Combined Bottom-up and Top-down Saliency Maps
    Seak, Zhang-Qin
    Ang, Li-Minn
    Seng, Kah-Phooi
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCSIT 2010), VOL 5, 2010, : 477 - 480
  • [30] A BOTTOM-UP AND TOP-DOWN MODEL FOR CELL SEGMENTATION USING MULTISPECTRAL DATA
    Wu, Xuqing
    Shah, Shishir K.
    2010 7TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING: FROM NANO TO MACRO, 2010, : 592 - 595